Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: EternalVigilance
Because of the rape and incest exceptions? Why not come out and say it?

Or are you saying NRTL gave too much support for the amendment and not enough opposition to the rest of the bill? I can understand that objection, which at least doesn't slander those who voted for the pro-life amendment.

A vote against Stupak was a vote for murder.

16 posted on 11/12/2009 4:15:05 AM PST by cmj328 (Filibuster FOCA--a/k/a ObamaCare--or lose reelection)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: cmj328
Because of the rape and incest exceptions? Why not come out and say it?

I'll say it quite clearly. Any vote for a rape and incest exception is a vote for the destruction of the core American principle of the equal protection of the laws for ALL, and of the very purpose of American government: the defense of the God-given unalienable rights of every single innocent human persons.

18 posted on 11/12/2009 4:19:58 AM PST by EternalVigilance (Partisans only for principle. - America's Independent Party - AIPNews.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: cmj328; Gelato; wagglebee; 8mmMauser; MountainFlower; Steve Schulin
A vote against Stupak was a vote for murder.

Really? I guess you missed this:

The Stupak Amendment was a complete scam. All it did was provide political cover for Republicans and "blue dog" Democrats, and for the passage of the overall bill. It provided NO cover for the children, or for the principle of the protection of the unalienable rights of all. None.

19 posted on 11/12/2009 4:24:07 AM PST by EternalVigilance (Partisans only for principle. - America's Independent Party - AIPNews.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson