Sorry, but GGG´s contention is *indeed* that it wasn´t fossilized. It´s central to his conceit.
Sorry, the article des say ‘fossilized’ and says that if a Completely fossilized item were ‘demineralized’ it would all dissolve (Sinceit would satrt out ALL Mineral).
But the demineralization left behind soft tissue, because while fossilized, it was not completely so.
Nat, You have comprehension problems. The bones were 'fossilized' AND there was still soft tissue that was well preserved inside the fossil. When the minerals were removed, the soft tissue was left behind. Is that so difficult to understand?
Typical evo trying to understand science:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vmsuYeztVbs