Natural Law is just upset because I have caught him plagiarizing large quotes on more than one occasion. I have even caught him taking stuff out of his plagiarized quotes to make them seem more authoritative. I of course called him on it, and now he’s upset. But what I can’t figure out is why he keeps drawing attention to his shameful acts. Could it be that he has no shame?
I have done nothing to be shameful of. The source if the information is not as important as the relevancy and validity of the content. If you were to find prove the content false you might have a reason to puff up your chest, but trying to discredit my postings because I didn't follow proper footnote protocol??? Of course you can continue the ad hominem as opposed to actually refuting the content in the posts, but that will only further diminish the merit of your arguments. I will continue to stand on the shoulders of giants!