instead of ismpyl saying “we have a different opinion about hte age of the earth’ your side ALWAYS hasto get your little digs in by calling anyhtign that doesn’t jive with your ASSUMPTIONS abotu the age of the earth as ‘psuedoscience’- IF your theory is strong enough to stand on it’s own- then simply let the evidence speak for itself- IF there are problems, cede those problems- your case isn’t bolstered by ad hominems agaisnt htose that oppose your viewpoint- infact, it just goes to point out you feel your evidence is so weak that you must prop it up by ridiculing your opposition
It does. That's the point.