Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Romney builds political capital while biding time on 2012 run (defends Romneycare, Obama) (BARF)
CNN ^ | 2009-11-09 | Kevin Bohn

Posted on 11/10/2009 1:04:08 AM PST by rabscuttle385

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 last
To: BruceS
but is this where you say he defends Obama? Calling him wrong is support?

Well, you need to look at the bigger picture.

The country is going to Hell and General McCrystal in Afghanistan haven't talked to the President since April, at the time. But Obama has time to play Chicago politics by shilling for the stupid Olympic Games.

It just makes Romney look bad to conservatives, who don't want to be Obama's "buddy," and sure as Hell don't think he's "cool."

41 posted on 11/10/2009 7:10:51 AM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist (90% of the fedgov is unconstitutional. The other 10% besides the military doesnt know what it's doin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

If Romney is the GOP nominee, I will vote 3rd party.


42 posted on 11/10/2009 7:54:34 AM PST by Le Chien Rouge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Le Chien Rouge
If Romney is the GOP nominee, I will vote 3rd party.

If Huckabee is the nominee, I will find a follower of the Christ to vote for.
shalom b'SHEM Yah'shua HaMashiach
43 posted on 11/10/2009 7:58:04 AM PST by Uri’el-2012 (Psalm 119:174 I long for Your salvation, YHvH, Your law is my delight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Venturer

Agreed, I will fight this guy with every ounce of my body, this guy is no heir to Reagan, and for him to try to sell himself as one is no less slimy than Fauxbama or Pelosi lying about their actions.

This guy is not a conservative, he can talk pretty rhetoric all he wants, but his actions prove otherwise.

No conservative, none can put forth a law that basically taxes you for breathing such as Romneycare does, and claim to be a conservative.

If the democrats were to pick our nominee, this would be the guy they’d chose. His actions do not match his rhetoric, and never will.


44 posted on 11/10/2009 8:05:25 AM PST by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Timeout; jimrob

-—”.....You captured exactly why I want Rudy. He wouldn’t schmooze Congress. And he’s not afraid of the media. He laughs at them!......”-—

“Rudy for President” is the battle cry of the RINO. You are SOOOOO at the wrong site for pushing Rudy Giuliani as the GOP nominee in 2012.

Rudy Giuliani as the GOP nominee would be the only imaginable scenario in which I would find myself forced to vote for, and pavement walk for, Barack Obama. Hell, I’d take a week’s vacation to volunteer for Obama in a swing state.

As the non-GOP nominee, there are many things I like about Rudy. But the day he becomes our Presidential nominee is the day the GOP leaves me. This is a party of issues, not a cult of personality. I would rather lose an election to save the Conservative movement than sacrifice the movement to win one election.

If I have to choose between two liberals, I’ll just pick the one who’ll give me “free” stuff. Rudy is a fun character, and a brass knuckles guy who could teach the image-conscious GOP some lessons about handling the press. But he is not Presidential material, and would be the death knell of the Conservative movement as we know it.


45 posted on 11/10/2009 8:07:57 AM PST by TitansAFC (Socialism is a disease; Sarah Palin is the cure. Palin/Romney 2012 or Palin/Gingrich 2012!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

Defending obama is hardly going to get him the nomination. We cannot allow them to pick our candidate again. Too much at stake.


46 posted on 11/10/2009 8:08:07 AM PST by jersey117
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385
"We have a plan in Massachusetts that is working pretty well",
the carpetbagger RINO Bishop, hiding in La Jolla, smirked.
47 posted on 11/10/2009 9:06:22 AM PST by Diogenesis ("Those who go below the surface do so at their peril" - Oscar Wilde)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Bump!


48 posted on 11/10/2009 9:11:57 AM PST by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: TitansAFC

You’re welcome to your preference, I to mine.

Do you have any idea how irksome it is to say I’m “at the wrong site”? I was here long before you joined. And I must say I enjoyed FR a lot more before the “purification” started. I guess I’m just not into group-think.


49 posted on 11/10/2009 9:34:32 AM PST by Timeout (Brits have the royals. Russia, the Nomenklatura. WE have our privileged "public servant" class.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Timeout

I respect your right to a different viewpoint, but “purification” is a bit of a herring in this particular case

“Purification” makes for a nice pious plea, but you have to understand the difference between having no room for any differences at any level (”Newt Gingrich is a RINO!” “I’ll never vote for Charlie Crist for Senate!”), and not being willing to support for PRESIDENT a candidate who has been so very consistent an enemy of so very many key Conservative issues as Rudy Giuliani. Such opposition is hardly the unreasonable demands of a puritan grassroots.

I get a lot of flack for supporting the idea of Moderate Republicans in deep blue states (hell, I’d support Rudy for Senator of NY), and objecting to the purging of the center. But my gosh, man, there wouldn’t even be a POINT to the GOP anymore if Rudy Giuliani were the GOP nominee for PRESIDENT. No point whatsoever.

Very different from “purification.”


50 posted on 11/10/2009 10:10:45 AM PST by TitansAFC (Socialism is a disease; Sarah Palin is the cure. Palin/Romney 2012 or Palin/Gingrich 2012!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

Romney wastes his time. He is a loser.


51 posted on 11/10/2009 10:28:39 AM PST by Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FastCoyote
Please, when will Romney’s time be up?

To calculate: determine how much money Mittens has, divided by the burn rate, then multiply by the weight of his massive ego.

52 posted on 11/10/2009 10:59:17 AM PST by mountainbunny (Mitt Romney: Would you buy a used car from this huckster?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: TitansAFC

OK. Truce.

I thought you were saying I didn’t belong here when you referred to my being at the wrong site.

Peace, bro.


53 posted on 11/10/2009 1:28:38 PM PST by Timeout (Brits have the royals. Russia, the Nomenklatura. WE have our privileged "public servant" class.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

As I said, I am not a Romney supporter. I was merely asking where in the article it said that Romney was defending President Obama - as was added to the title of the article. There is plenty to slam Romney on, without resorting to mis-characterizing what he says.


54 posted on 11/11/2009 4:12:25 AM PST by BruceS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson