Skip to comments.
Firefight Between North and South Korean Navy This Morning: Causualty Unknown
Yonhap News ^
| 11/10/09
Posted on 11/09/2009 7:19:35 PM PST by TigerLikesRooster
Firefight Between North and South Korean Navy This Morning: Causualty Unknown
Happened on the morning of Nov. 10 at NLL.
N. Korean patrol boats went over NLL to the south. Warning shots fired, but ignored. S. Korean navy fired at N. Korean ship. N. Koreans returned fire.
TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: casualty; firefight; korea; korean; morning; navy; nkorea; northkorea; skorea; southkorea; unknown
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 next last
To: AmericanInTokyo
"I think they are using the stick."
I believe that to be the case, also. I appreciate your input.
I have a question for you. Why is the US so concentrated on Iran's possible nuclear weapons capabilities and ignoring North Korea's nukes? I don't get it.
81
posted on
11/10/2009 1:00:56 AM PST
by
A Navy Vet
(An Oath Is Forever.)
To: jhpigott
Hey,,,Looks like lil’kim’s guys got a whuppin’...;0)
82
posted on
11/10/2009 1:39:39 AM PST
by
1COUNTER-MORTER-68
(THROWING ANOTHER BULLET-RIDDLED TV IN THE PILE OUT BACK~~~~~)
To: TigerLikesRooster
God bless those fighting. I was stationed in South Korea and there is some great Sailors. I still keep in contact with a few on facebook. I will have to find out if they are ok...hopefully they are.
To: A Navy Vet
Probably because Israel stands a good chance at being wiped off the map. That probably has something to do with it. Also, more or less, the intelligence on Iran is more clear than with North Korea, where it is so hard to get a clear picture due to little to now humint and also North Koreans hiding everything underground.
84
posted on
11/10/2009 2:51:55 AM PST
by
AmericanInTokyo
(Major Nidal Malik Hasan: American "bitterly clinging to guns & religion", right Mr. Obama?)
To: TigerLikesRooster; SevenofNine
You were right about North Korean TV tonight (about two and a half hours ago, at the 5 p.m. hour) which we could pick up in Tokyo.
They had the blathering idiot on there at the top of the news, although this one was not PMS-Ajumma, but appeared to be more of an Agashi (young woman), actually not too bad looking but she sure spouted the DPRK vitriol.
And it went down like this, according to North Korean TV.
The South Korean Navy infilitrated DPRK maritime terrority. The gun battle ensued. The South Korean vessel as hit. It was a fait daccompli, and they fled from North Korean waters. Now it is SOUTH KOREAN which owes the Democratic Peoples Republic an apology. She spat it out like bile.
85
posted on
11/10/2009 2:55:54 AM PST
by
AmericanInTokyo
(Major Nidal Malik Hasan: American "bitterly clinging to guns & religion", right Mr. Obama?)
To: avacado
He’ll wait until well after South Korea is overrun before making any military decision to defend a free country.
86
posted on
11/10/2009 2:57:32 AM PST
by
MRadtke
(NOT the baseball player)
To: AmericanInTokyo
No surprise then. I was interested in what new bomb shell (or some announcement to that effect) will be announced in their news cast. Such as blathering about abrogating Armistice agreement altogether.
Let's sit back and watch. It all boils down to what Chia Head is thinking tonight.
87
posted on
11/10/2009 3:05:21 AM PST
by
TigerLikesRooster
(LUV DIC -- L,U,V-shaped recession, Depression, Inflation, Collapse)
To: Liberty Valance; AmericanInTokyo; Carry_Okie; Jet Jaguar; SevenofNine; gaijin
Today's Chosun Ilbo Cartoon
Title: Change of administration driven home
Dialogue: Comrade, things are indeed not what it used to be (a NK sailor on the blown-up NK navy vessel)
88
posted on
11/10/2009 3:21:07 AM PST
by
TigerLikesRooster
(LUV DIC -- L,U,V-shaped recession, Depression, Inflation, Collapse)
To: TigerLikesRooster
Thanks for posting the cartoon.
89
posted on
11/10/2009 4:05:59 AM PST
by
csvset
To: TigerLikesRooster
90
posted on
11/10/2009 5:30:00 AM PST
by
myknowledge
(F-22 Raptor: World's Largest Distributor of Sukhoi parts!)
To: cmsgop
OOOOHHHHHH! I hate the stuff.
91
posted on
11/10/2009 5:33:23 AM PST
by
mad_as_he$$
(Beneath this mask there is an idea, Mr. Creedy, and ideas are bulletproof. V for victory)
To: myknowledge
Go ROK Navy!
92
posted on
11/10/2009 5:33:49 AM PST
by
TigerLikesRooster
(LUV DIC -- L,U,V-shaped recession, Depression, Inflation, Collapse)
To: A Navy Vet
Why is the US so concentrated on Iran's possible nuclear weapons capabilities and ignoring North Korea's nukes? I don't get it. We're borrowing oodles of money from China.
93
posted on
11/10/2009 5:41:19 AM PST
by
Carry_Okie
(Islam offers three choices: surrender, fight, or die.)
To: AmericanInTokyo
“She spat it out like bile. “
The alternative was eating sawdust in a labor camp.
94
posted on
11/10/2009 5:53:47 AM PST
by
AppyPappy
(If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
To: AmericanInTokyo; tx_eggman
I see an apparation of satan in the creases of his trousers.
good golly, don't show me it's horn.
95
posted on
11/10/2009 5:56:11 AM PST
by
SpinnerWebb
(mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves)
To: TigerLikesRooster
Right. Chia Head turned one of his aging navy boats into a Swiss cheese to make this little point. A pathetic loser.Right. The US Iowa Class battleship is pretty old too, but i still wouldn't want to engage it with just the 5" forward gun on an Aegis cruiser. The Aegis would end up a burning oil slick on the ocean.
Just saying that old doesn't necessarily mean not capable. i have NO idea what type of ships are in service in the DPRK navy, but i imagine that the ROK navy is pretty well equipped.
The real question here is whether Kim is still calling the shots in the DPRK.
96
posted on
11/10/2009 5:58:52 AM PST
by
Calvinist_Dark_Lord
((I have come here to kick @$$ and chew bubblegum...and I'm all outta bubblegum! ~Roddy Piper))
To: Calvinist_Dark_Lord
Their ship is bigger, and more guns. Their weapons on board are all manually controlled, though.
S. Korean ship is newer and faster. It has computer controlled auto-cannons on board. Targeting and firing are said to be done more or less automatically. More precise and focused damage to enemy ship.
In the previous match several years ago, SK ship took the hit first and badly damaged, but once it started firing, it pretty much leveled NK ship. The top half was gone.
97
posted on
11/10/2009 6:08:49 AM PST
by
TigerLikesRooster
(LUV DIC -- L,U,V-shaped recession, Depression, Inflation, Collapse)
To: TigerLikesRooster
Thanks for the info.
What kind of navy does the ROK possess? i’d be interested in their ships in particular. US design?
i was always more concerned about the air and ground aspect of a war between the DPRK and the ROK. Had always assumed (bad word, i know) that the sea lanes would be shut down by US fast attack subs.
If ground hostilities happen, we’re pretty much spectators, since we don’t have many troops to commit any more, and no easy way to get them there.
98
posted on
11/10/2009 6:25:07 AM PST
by
Calvinist_Dark_Lord
((I have come here to kick @$$ and chew bubblegum...and I'm all outta bubblegum! ~Roddy Piper))
To: Calvinist_Dark_Lord
Yes, a majority of them are U.S. design. Some old U.S. surface ships and now several Aegis destroyers.
Submarines are of German design, I think.
There are many patrol ships. Not sure if they are also of U.S. design.
99
posted on
11/10/2009 6:33:27 AM PST
by
TigerLikesRooster
(LUV DIC -- L,U,V-shaped recession, Depression, Inflation, Collapse)
To: stephenjohnbanker; FBD; TheConservativeParty
Hang on, could be a
bumpy ride.
This incident sure as the potential of taking the Health Scare and C&T debacles off the front burner & far from the public eye.
Funny, that.
Let us keep our eyes on the ball.
100
posted on
11/10/2009 6:38:23 AM PST
by
Landru
(Forget the pebble Grasshopper, just leave.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson