fossilized leg bone …………….Removal of the mineral phase…………demineralized bone
But lets not let the “facts” interfere with our creation myth. As you have previously stated there is no amount of evidence that would cause you to accept the evolutionary theory
I didn’t overlook anything. You can say those words all you want but if you don’t understand the process of what they did it really doesn’t matter.
Here is another quote “ In modern bone, removing the minerals leaves supple, soft organic materials that are much easier to work with in a lab. In contrast, fossilized bone is BELIEVED to be completely mineralized, meaning no organics are present. Attempting to dissolve the minerals from a piece of fossilized bone, so the theory goes, would merely dissolve the entire fossil. But the team was surprised by what actually happened when they removed the minerals from the T. rex femur fragment. The removal process left behind stretchy bone matrix material that, when examined microscopically, seemed to show blood vessels, osteocytes, or bone building cells, and other recognizable organic features.”
IOW the bone was mineralized but the soft tissue was not. That is how the bone was demineralized to get to the soft tissue.
BTW, I never said that there was no amount of evidence that would cause me to accept the evolutionary theory. You have some uninformed belief that I do not look at the facts. I see the same facts you do, I just do not agree with your interpretation.
BTW I have no idea how this post is in response to the one you posted it to. I was actually agreeing with you.