Posted on 11/08/2009 6:11:23 PM PST by Protect the Bill of Rights
The measure of a civilization is how it treats those who have hurt it.
Major Nidal Malik Hasan was not a bad person. He was even possibly a good person. But he was a very sick person who did a terrible thing.
If you are someone who disagrees with that, then I would suggest you stop reading now.
If however you do agree with me, in addition to being as upset as I was by the Ft. Hood killings -- which were evil acts -- you’d be as curious as I was and am to understand how and why and when Major Hasan did what he did and what if anything we can learn to prevent this from ever happening again.
My first presupposition is that nobody is born bad, but everybody is born vulnerable. By that I mean that I don’t believe that anyone is born evil unless of course you believe in such a thing as the Devil incarnate. However, I think that you will agree that everyone is born vulnerable in that we are all unable to take care of ourselves at birth and must accept whatever parenting or care giving is provided us.
Next I must add a disclaimer that what follows is empirically based on thirty years as a practicing psychiatrist and psychotherapist. It has been verified by formerly enlisted and senior officers from the Armed Forces, but has not been validated by any research or double blinded studies.
How did it happen?
Central to nearly all the people I have treated or spoken with who suffer from Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (in preparation of my book, “Post Traumatic Stress Disorder for Dummies”) is the “fear of re-traumatization” and their efforts at any and all costs to avoid it often results in the symptoms they develop.
Soldiers enter basic training as “loosey goosey” enlistees who are then broken down and built back up into fighting machines devoted to fulfilling a mission and the well-being of their fellow soldiers. Imagine those recruits as a “green” rattling Ford pickup truck that can’t take a corner safely, being torn down and rebuilt into a turbo-charged Porsche that can handle any curve thrown at it and you get an idea of what the process is like.
After they finish basic training, it’s pretty heady, adrenaline driven stuff that can make soldiers feel nearly superhuman. Add to that the notion that they are going to fight evil and they can feel like a band of superheroes out to rid the world of villains.
Even Hollywood has jumped on this metaphor with the popular Transformer movies where rattling cars and trucks are broken down and reconfigured and rebuilt into monsters of good and evil. Get the idea?
But then they hit the reality of war face on or rather it hits them in the face. In the process they see horrors and create collateral damage no training can fully prepare you for. Imagine being ordered to run over a young child who will not get out of the way and you can’t swerve to avoid them because of the mine-laden side of the road and hearing the thump of their body as they hit the bottom of your Humvee. Or imagine following orders to take out a sniper nest in a house in a village and then entering it, only to discover a dog, a grandpa, a mother, and two children “shredded” or incinerated by you.
What happens to you when all your training for war runs head on into the debasement of humanity that you perpetrate in waging it?
The trauma cuts you to your core. The horrors that you see and the horrors that you caused won’t leave you alone. You don’t tell anyone else, because you think they’re handling it better than you . You are just weak and missing the “right stuff” that your fellow soldiers have.
Although you never fully get over that trauma that rips you to the center of your being, as in human being, your training is good enough to enable you to get past it through the days and weeks and possibly even the tour of duty you are on. However the damage is done and the crack in the porcelain of what was once your soul remains.
You don’t let the world know about it and you do everything you can to not feel that fragility. But even though you don’t think about it, you believe that if you were re-traumatized that crack would cause you to shatter from the inside out and like Humpty Dumpty, all the king’s horses and all the king’s medics would never be able to put you back together again.
So you live your life avoiding anything that might re-traumatize you. You numb yourself with alcohol or drugs; you withdraw from family matters especially the yelling of your spouse and young children. Every now and then a car backfires or something catches you by surprise and you jump out of your skin, because you had temporarily relaxed your guard and that temporarily removed the paper thin veneer protective graft above your crack. It’s like someone pouring acid in an open cut, except this cut is in your mind.
If you are put in a situation in which you feel you will be re-traumatized, you can go into a state of near panic, in which you resort to your most basic “fight or flight” instincts.
We can’t know for sure, but I believe that the threat of deployment of Major Hasan to first hand have to go into combat and witness and even support Americans killing Muslims was just too much. Previously traumatized by hearing the stories of too many soldiers with PTSD and too many soldiers telling tales of killing Muslims (who he increasingly felt a kinship too) and their families, the fear of now going and perpetrating it firsthand may have proved too much, caused him to panic, and react to that panic by perpetrating the killings he did.
Why did it happen?
Have you ever passed a cut tree and seen all the exposed rings? Each of those rings represents a year in the life of that tree. Some of those rings may look thick and healthy indicating and good year; some may look very thin indicating a drought; some may look darkened indicating a forest fire that the tree survived; some may look nearly rotted indicating some fungal or insect infestation. In your minds eye you can also imagine that those years will have a lot to do with the eventual health of that tree and its overall resilience.
Trees are not the only living creatures that develop from the inside out. Imagine your brain as actually having three brains. Like the rings of a tree layered one upon the other, imagine your human (neomammalian) upper brain is layered upon your paleomammalian middle brain is layered upon your most primitive reptilian lower brain.
Now imagine figuratively that a recruit’s brain and “loosey gooseyness” is due to their three brains being loosely wired together. Then imagine that during basic training, those loose wires are stretched and even broken. But then those three brain are built up in to a tightly wired machine specialized for waging war.
When a highly trained, tightly wired and molded for war brain suddenly runs face into horrors perpetrated upon you and that you perpetrate on others, soldiers show that they are not Transformers, but rather, that they are too human an animal.
When did it happen?
In the face of that, your three brains lose the way they are wired and coupled to each other. But being used to being tightly coupled they will spontaneously recouple, but this time with a new mission. This new mission is to avoid re-traumatization at all costs.
And perhaps that was the mission that Major Hasan was on and that he fulfilled with his bloody massacre. Because lets face it, he may have killed and traumatized many others, but he avoided the re-traumatization that being deployed might have caused.
****
[bold mine]
LOL! Good way to put it!
Yes, isn’t that an amazing reach? This sap has leaned so ‘far out’ over the void, his loosey-goosey brain material is running out of his ear. A mind numbing read.
Evil is evil. Case closed. Psychology is infested with lefties.
Yeah, they would think that too. Along side with Pol Pot, 9/11 Terrorist, Mao Zedong, Eric Harris/Dylan Klebold, Ted Bundy, Jeffrey Dahmer, Fred Phelps, Charles Manson, Lori Drew, etc.
Well gees, almost every evil regime was on the left. Same goes with terrorism and various mass killers.
How can this MORON have any kind of degree, never mind a doctoral degree allowing him to practice psychiatry??? oh, that's right, well the terrorist had one of those too....
Still, does the wise (sic) author not see a bit of the contradiction in saying that the perp wanted to "avoid re-traumatization at all costs" by going on a frickin' terrorist shooting spree???
The editors of Psychology Today actually publish this babble?
oh, the douchebag who is supposed to "re-traumatized" spent his adult life in medical training and then practice (of some kind, whether he was worth a damn is another question).... and in his "deployment" he most definitely was not going to be in combat as an Army psychiatrist....
no, all early signs are that it all stems from his fanatical jihadist beliefs, plain and simple.
political correctness + psychobabble = more unnecessary deaths and our civilization is being undermined
Ghoulson's psychobabble has found willing ears since Obama warned the nation not to "jump to conclusions" about poor misunderstood mass murderer Nidal.
This fourth-rate Dr. Phil has sold his professional soul for a handful of silver--while covering the actions of a now-proven Muslim suicide terrorist with a blanket of ersatz "sympathy & understanding."
There's gotta be a law against M.D. like this.
I’m glad the author saved me some time with the warning in the third sentence.
What a load.
It's worse than that - Hasan WAS a shrink!
Oh. So he is a good man, under stress. The military’s fault. Poor guy. Those victims were just the buffer he needed to work out his stresses. What a shame that the policewoman came in and stopped him. He was EXPRESSING his rage, and there is nothing wrong with that. He’s a good man. Nothing evil about him. No sir.
This was the writer's first line, and of course he is implying that a true civilization forgives those who hurt it.
But that is not true.
It's one thing for people to forgive each other. But if a civilization forgives those who hurt it, then those who hurt it will not stop hurting it, and eventually will destroy it.
The writer of this article, Mark Goulston, is not being pacifistic in his understanding. He is being seditious against the lives of his Western American civilization. He - and everyone on the planet - knows without any shadow of a doubt that this shooting was a planned Islamic terrorist attack, accomplished in order to promote the takeover of the entire world by Islam, upon pain of death and slavery to anyone who resists it, and to the utter enslavement of all the women on the planet as property.
That was it's only purpose.
Mark Goulston knows this too. But he has written an article to try to get America to lay itself open to be destroyed by these types of attacks - to die in order to enable murderers to succeed. He has done this because of his own personal cowardice, and because obedience to that cowardice has made him immune to his own hypocrisy.
In my book, that makes Mark Goulston evil. And the next time someone dies because politically correct policy has allowed Muslim slaughter, make no mistake - the blood of the dead will be on Mark Goulston's evil, evil hands.
If he had been a white, straight guy who shot up a bunch of blacks or gays, he’d be seen as evil. It’s all about the context. If he shot up everyone in a church, the media would immediately ask for all churches to be closed so they don’t tempt more people to kill.
So in the drive to excuse this terrorist and the ideology behind him and his actions, PTSD now stands for Pre-Tramautic Stress Syndrome? Did I get this right?
Just damn.
LOL! Wicked post, I spilled my coffee (but it was worth it).
Seconded.
Just how much more does an Islamic extremist have to do before one might get a clue as to why he acted the way he did?
Some people who don't think they can know for sure don't realize that perspective merely throws gasoline on the smoldering fire of Taqquiri.
Besides, we don't have to know for sure, because his Criminal behavior should be penalized by capital punishment. Kill the murdering terrorist and let everybody else live with it.
..."but I believe that the threat of deployment of Major Hasan to first hand have to go into combat and witness and even support Americans killing Muslims was just too much."
He's a Field grade officer in the US Army. He should relish the idea of getting the opportunity to go to war to defend our nation and perhaps influence the power of our Adversaries. His actions indicate his stress was predicated upon his traitorous thinking, lack of self-discipline to avoid such thinking, lack of integrity to grasp how to live in freedom, and apparantly a fatal frantic search for happiness in anything other than what God provides.
... "Previously traumatized by hearing the stories of too many soldiers with PTSD and too many soldiers telling tales of killing Muslims (who he increasingly felt a kinship too) and their families, the fear of now going and perpetrating it firsthand may have proved too much, caused him to panic, and react to that panic by perpetrating the killings he did.
I see the author has no problems surmising about the tales the criminal psychiatrist endured, but lacks the discernment to identify the actions as murder, calling them killings in the same sentence he speaks of soldiers engaged in combat as killing Muslims.
IMHO, there isn't much difference between the author's perspective and the Muslim perspective. Neither position recognize God through faith in Christ. Both attempt to solve problems independent of God and what He provides.
"My first presupposition is that nobody is born bad, but everybody is born vulnerable."
There is only some 2000 years of Christian theology and another 3000 years or so of Hebrew theology which counters that position at fundamental levels of understanding, yet here we have a criminal mind and his peer ignorant of basics touching directly upon the issue contemplating the righteousness of murder and terror.
Great testimony of those who purport to be great, independent of God, as they manifest the greatest of foolishness and are too arrogant to perceive their own malaise.
Let's not.
The Marines I trained with, weren't 'loosey goosey', but were placed under tremendous stress during recruit training in order to discern which men were not able to function under the stress they would likely encounter in combat, thereby failing to perform as functional team members.
It didn't have crap to deal with breaking them down psychologically and rebuilding them.
Maybe the author needs to consider the perspective that all humans have volition and free will, and how to live and let live in organizations which build upon that volition. The discipline and integrity within the character of soldiers is built upon respect for legitimate authority.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.