[Publius6961]

In the third case, the Japanese-Americans, they were removed from society merely for who they were. Are you suggesting the same for Muslims?

If the shoe fits.
The myth of "merely for who they were" continues.
It was the combination of who they were AND the closed cultural imperative of never 'giving away' a member, even when they engaged in treason.

Perhaps you would like to debunk the facts?
Give it a shot.

And just for reference...

Take your time.

[Non-Sequitur]

If all Muslims are our enemy then what are we doing in Iraq and Afghanistan?