[pillut48]

Keep your crude DU curses to yourself, thank you very much.
The subject matter you posted was disgusting and not worthy of being on FR.

There’s also this little thing called a sarcasm tag ( /sarc )
that indicates to readers that the author is joking. Your post didn’t have one, which indicated you were being serious.

After being here for almost 11 years, you should know that.

[zipper]

There’s also this little thing called a sarcasm tag ( /sarc ) that indicates to readers that the author is joking. Your post didn’t have one, which indicated you were being serious.

(WARNING: no sarcasm tags: may require normal intelligence)

So let me get this straight....

I posted a one-line remark to another FRiend (not you), pointing out the parallels between the left's reference to a crude homosexual practice, and using it to label those of us on the right, and a well-known historic incident to yet another crude sexual practice.

Although I was explicit in my description you didn't get the historical reference, because, well...

And even if you did get it, you still thought it should be labeled as sarcasm, presumbly to school the lesser among us...

Not that it would have mattered anyway had I added a sarcasm tag, since in your topsy-turvy world of logic the "subject matter [I] posted was disgusting and not worthy of being on FR" on a thread entitled "Obama Uses Crude Gay-Baiting Sexual Slur to Attack Tea Party Protesters"

And if none of that works, there's always the "go back to DU" insult, directed in this case at someone who's been here around six years longer than you...

...I get it now. I think I found out what your problem is....