To: LS
I never believed this "Blue Dog" BS even back when they talked about it in the mid 1990s. This label just describes a group of people able to successfully lie to enough idiot voters to convince them that they are conservative just in the hopes of getting elected.
The fact that it works is more of a reflection of the idiocy of the average US voter than it is on the "duplicity" of the members of this group.
I'll bet the same people who though that the flaming liberal "Blue Dogs" were going to "save" us also believed in the PUMAs, right?
10 posted on
11/08/2009 5:40:49 AM PST by
pnh102
(Regarding liberalism, always attribute to malice what you think can be explained by stupidity. - Me)
To: pnh102
I totally agree with you about this “blue dog” myth. They are found out this time around. In fact, I would say that the “blue dogs” are worse than the leftist, liberal Dems because they are acting like Republicans with the Dem label but when tough votes are needed for the Dems, they vote Democrat.
14 posted on
11/08/2009 5:43:16 AM PST by
truthandlife
("Some trust in chariots and some in horses, but we trust in the name of the LORD our God." (Ps 20:7))
To: pnh102
Yep. Ah, the mysterious pumas-—never seen in daylight on a November election day.
15 posted on
11/08/2009 5:43:20 AM PST by
LS
("Castles made of sand, fall in the sea . . . eventually." (Hendrix))
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson