Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kralcmot

Life Magazine attacked Senator McCarthy on April 10, 1950 for his anti-communism speech given in West Virginia. This was the beginning. From that point forward, promotion of marxist ideology became the raison d’être of popoular media.

So, indeed, you are correct. It is not just the military.

But I’d would like to offer a message of hope for you, fellow FReeper.

The Diane Sawyers, along with Barak Obama and all of the leftists today, are on the wrong side of history. Before it is all done, before the history is written, people will remember folks like that the way they remember members of the American Nazi Party of the 1930s.

This is historical inevitability. George W. Bush will be recorded as far ahead of his time, and the first to take a stand against the evils of jihadist fascism that all decent civilization must eventually confront.

People will spit when they say Obama’s name, remembering him as an appeaser at best, traitor at worst. His best case would be a Neville Chamberlin, Benedict Arnold is more likely.


11 posted on 11/08/2009 1:28:04 AM PST by advance_copy (Stand for life or nothing at all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: advance_copy

i don’t give a Shiite about history

what i am interested in is now.

history will be for someone when i am long gone

now is for me

thanks for the message of hope....

but its not what i need

how many could have been saved if Chamberlain had any sense?

“When Stanley Baldwin retired in May 1937, Chamberlain took his place as Prime Minister. His premiership was dominated by the question of policy towards the increasingly aggressive Germany, and his actions at Munich were wildly popular among Britons.” Wikipedia

I read “the Last Lion” an account of the years between WWI and WWII and Winston Churchill’s life during that time. The similarities to our situation today are frightening.

Liberal appeasers were in control...the press, the government...all of it. The economy was in shambles, and was ample justification for refusal to take notice of the coming disaster.

Europe was destroyed. Only America and Russia were saved....and Russia, just barely....and, for what? for Stalin and the 50 year Cold War.

History is witness to the stupidity of Chamberlain, yes. But at what cost?

And, of course, the question is before us now...what price will be paid for this lunacy?


13 posted on 11/08/2009 1:52:02 AM PST by kralcmot (my tagline died with Terri)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: advance_copy
His best case would be a Neville Chamberlin, Benedict Arnold is more likely.

I was actually already thinking Bozo . . .

16 posted on 11/08/2009 3:00:11 AM PST by Quiller (When you're fighting to survive, there is no "try" -- there is only do, or do not.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: advance_copy

The Diane Sawyers of the media have to follow the rules laid out by their big bosses. Gee, I wonder who owns most of our media.


17 posted on 11/08/2009 3:57:20 AM PST by seemoAR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson