Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: nutmeg
Joseph Cao (sp?) Republican, Lousiana voted FOR the bill. (WHY???)

He (Vietnamese heritage) was among last two Republicans to vote. It already had 218 votes when he voted. Since he took Jefferson's place in Louisiana, in a fairly heavily minority district, he probably voted Yea just to be able to say he did back home. I doubt he would have voted Yea if the bill had not already passed.

Some Dim Nays were also probably ass covering votes for Blue Dogs once the Dims knew they had the required 218. There's always some of that on any vote.

168 posted on 11/07/2009 8:24:25 PM PST by Will88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies ]


To: Will88

I thought maybe the newbie voted “Yea” to preserve the rights of the minority to challenge the bill’s vote in the future. I recall some kind of arcane rule about that. Since he was the new guy, he drew the short straw.

If not, he’s a one termer.You don’t buck the party on your first vote.

We only needed two more Blue Dogs.

Well, in 2010, our job will be to see that there are no Blue Dogs re-elected to Congress.

We can’t fence sit anymore. The battle is joined and there is less than one year to accomplish the task.

Buckle up—it’s gonna be a bumpy ride.

And remember—Democrats are the enemy of freedom.


225 posted on 11/07/2009 8:30:32 PM PST by exit82 (Democrats are the enemy of freedom. Sarah Palin is our Esther.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson