I guess the problem I have is that one who subscribes to the evolution Theory blidly discounts anything else. But then, in the same breath, decries that one who refutes that Theory and claims to stand on Faith, and the evidence that supports it gets their support information from sites that are pro-creation.
There is a school of thought called Creation Science. I see no problem or conflict with calling it such. Science that supports the idea of Creationism.
As a Christian, one SHOULD be looking for evidence that the Bible is correct, not seeking to discredit it.
As a Christian, I believe that, not only did Jesus bring the dead to life, but was Himself resurrected, DESPITE the FACT that science would tell us that a body, being dead 3 days cannot be brought back to life.
As a Christian, I believe that, not only did Jesus walk on water, but Peter did too, DESPITE science telling me that just isn’t possible, surface tension and all that.
AND Science may try to explain that man evolved from some small worm-like animal, but again, I would profess my belief that we were created in the likeness of God, as per Genesis.
Again, we disagree. I don’t believe that Christians must seek evidence to support the literal truth of the bible—it is allegorical.
Regarding creation science—it is no more than rationalization. A discipline that begins with a conclusion and collects anecdotes in tenuous support is not science.
And I am a Christian.