Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GodGunsGuts; Alamo-Girl
...and apparently felt ashamed for writing dishonestly in an attempt to gain a wider acceptance for his evo-atheist creation myth

Here you are attributing motives to Darwin — which is a very unscientific thing to do. But then it seems people do that sort of thing all the time nowadays....

Somehow, I just don't think it's right, or appropriate in a scientific discussion.

JMHO, FWIW

32 posted on 11/08/2009 12:25:25 PM PST by betty boop (Without God man neither knows which way to go, nor even understands who he is. —Pope Benedict XVI)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]


To: betty boop

Did you read the post? Darwin was ashamed of himself for “truckling to public opinion” because he substituted the word “creator” for what he really meant, which was “appeared.” What do you call it when a person deliberately says one thing, when they really mean something entirely different?


33 posted on 11/08/2009 12:44:04 PM PST by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson