Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pro-Life Advocates Upset Republicans May Vote Present on Stupak Amendment [electoral death warrants]
Life News ^ | November 6, 2009 | Steven Ertelt

Posted on 11/07/2009 5:26:39 PM PST by cmj328

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121 next last
No matter how "stunning" Steve King may be, if he votes present on this bill his political career is over. If Republicans kill this amendment, Republicans can kiss pro-life support good bye in every election from now until Armegeddon.

Anyone who votes against or "present" for this amendment in order to put party politics over saving the lives of babies and is a murderer and can go to Hell. Literally.

1 posted on 11/07/2009 5:26:41 PM PST by cmj328
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Coleus; narses

Please ping your lists and light up the switchboards for Shadegg, Gingrey, Garrett, and Steve King.


2 posted on 11/07/2009 5:28:02 PM PST by cmj328 (Filibuster FOCA--a/k/a ObamaCare--or lose reelection)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cmj328

Vote present, I agree.


3 posted on 11/07/2009 5:28:46 PM PST by joinedafterattack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cmj328

My goodness. Look at the BIG PICTURE. If Stupak fails (and it DID), now the blue dogs cannot, in their good conscience, vote FOR the final healthcare bill and it will fail! All of it. No federally funded abortions, no federally-funded healthcare for illegals, no private option, no NOTHING.


4 posted on 11/07/2009 5:29:01 PM PST by DRey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cmj328
" his political career is over."

It was an oral vote. We'll never know who voted what. The bill was defeated -- good -- now kill the rest of this dog with the help of the blue dogs.
5 posted on 11/07/2009 5:30:13 PM PST by DRey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cmj328

This is utter nonsense.

The goal is to DEFEAT Obamacare and Pelosicare.

Federal funding for abortion will go down to DEFEAT by defating the bill.

Defeating Stupak amendment is the right strategy.


6 posted on 11/07/2009 5:30:29 PM PST by indianrightwinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cmj328

I’ve been wondering about this myself. It seems to me if they vote to muck up the process, even if that means techinically voting against a prolife amendment, that’s still voting prolife in my book. Most research I’ve done, indicates that the amendment is out come conference time, so it’s just to give cover to dems. Don’t give them any cover.


7 posted on 11/07/2009 5:30:38 PM PST by mockingbyrd (Sarah speaks for me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cmj328

Disagree totally.

If voting the amendment down creates a poison pill for PelosiCare, then I agree with those voting present.


8 posted on 11/07/2009 5:30:40 PM PST by St. Louis Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cmj328

This amendment wasn’t pro-life. It was fake. Designed only to give Democrats from conservative districts cover.

You’re so far off the beam on this it isn’t even funny.


9 posted on 11/07/2009 5:31:13 PM PST by EternalVigilance (Conservatives didn't send a message to Republicans in NY-23 -The GOP sent a message to conservatives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mockingbyrd

The amendment contained not only rape and incest exceptions, it provided a health of the mother exception. It wouldn’t stop a single abortion, in other words.


10 posted on 11/07/2009 5:32:26 PM PST by EternalVigilance (Conservatives didn't send a message to Republicans in NY-23 -The GOP sent a message to conservatives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: mockingbyrd

You understand what is at stake while the poster of this thread doesn’t have a clue. The needed to vote no because Pelosi was going to strip it from the final bill anyway and basically said as much and why she agreed to a voice vote.


11 posted on 11/07/2009 5:32:47 PM PST by PhiKapMom (Mary Fallin - OK Gov/Coburn - Senate 2010 ! Take Back the House/Senate! Stop ZERO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

I agree with your comments 100%!


12 posted on 11/07/2009 5:33:47 PM PST by PhiKapMom (Mary Fallin - OK Gov/Coburn - Senate 2010 ! Take Back the House/Senate! Stop ZERO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: cmj328

National Right to Life and their mouthpiece Ertelt are completely compromised.

But I’m sure they can leverage this into lots of fundraising dollars. After all, that’s what they’re all about.


13 posted on 11/07/2009 5:35:16 PM PST by EternalVigilance (Conservatives didn't send a message to Republicans in NY-23 -The GOP sent a message to conservatives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom

My blood pressure is probably off the chart tonight.

We’re watching the destruction of our country.


14 posted on 11/07/2009 5:37:16 PM PST by EternalVigilance (Conservatives didn't send a message to Republicans in NY-23 -The GOP sent a message to conservatives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom

That’s exactly right in our convoluted political system. Voting against a fake “pro-life” amendment is itself a pro-life act because it makes it crystal clear that it would only have facilitated the passage of an intrinsically evil bill.


15 posted on 11/07/2009 5:37:30 PM PST by wildandcrazyrussian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

Bullshit. It was life of the mother. Your hatred has compromised your soul. Go to Confession.


16 posted on 11/07/2009 5:37:40 PM PST by cmj328 (Filibuster FOCA--a/k/a ObamaCare--or lose reelection)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: St. Louis Conservative
If voting the amendment down creates a poison pill for PelosiCare, then I agree with those voting present.

Absolutely. I appreciate the concern, but there is the reality of the legislative process: you can rarely get anything done if you take a vow of purity.

This approach is simply a means to an end. The GOP has few options these days, and if it can defeat Pelosicare through this maneuver, our ultimate goal is achieved.

17 posted on 11/07/2009 5:38:34 PM PST by freespirited (Liberals are only liberal about sex & drugs. Otherwise, they want to control your life. --DHorowitz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: mockingbyrd

Voting present gives cover to dems.


18 posted on 11/07/2009 5:39:16 PM PST by cmj328 (Filibuster FOCA--a/k/a ObamaCare--or lose reelection)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom

Me too.


19 posted on 11/07/2009 5:40:50 PM PST by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

Mine is right with you! I cannot believe what we are witnessing and also cannot believe anyone on here would fall for the Pelosi trick on abortion knowing full well she believes in abortion 100% including partial birth.


20 posted on 11/07/2009 5:40:54 PM PST by PhiKapMom (Mary Fallin - OK Gov/Coburn - Senate 2010 ! Take Back the House/Senate! Stop ZERO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson