Posted on 11/07/2009 6:34:51 AM PST by AmericanInTokyo
I have no doubt they are not limited to just the military. They are in Congress - discovered by an private undercover operation within CAIR which is reported on WND.
Political correctness is deadly and oppressive both in it’s celebration, praising and promotion of the bad guys and it’s hatred and demonization and demotion of the good guys. In this case it murdered a bunch of soldiers who trusted the politically correct military brass. That trust was misplaced.
Next time it murders from within, I hope for change in the MO so that Muslim reality may be targeted at the politically correct elite. That is the only way they will get serious and stop misdirecting and lying with race hate games. If it only kills citizens the elite can play politically correct games with it which is their way of laughing in the face of the people they killed.
The President actually did laugh in the face of the dead as he gave a shout out to one of PC’s diversity race groups before half heartedly addressing the “tragedy” that a known jihadist was placed in the military and enabled to kill a bunch of soldiers.
Good job, AIT!
It was clearly announced twice from the podium to all to stay put, and everyone there knew what it meant, i.e. when a VIP and his entourage/security enters or exits a large function. That man got up for a reason, and I don't think it was because the Preparation H was wearing off.
As you wisely noticed, military is supposed to know "stand", "sit", do this and do that.
And why was he attending events like this instead of doing his job at Walter Reed, which the Army trained him for at considerable expense?
Great post...
Liberals: idiots who think Goliath is speaking “truth to power” when taking to David...
We will probably never know what this terrorist’s mindset was on the day he attended this event. No matter what he may or may not have had in mind, this is chilling.
For liberals it's different - they decide how they "feel" then start calling people names who don't agree with them.
However, the fact is, he was actively involved or at the very least a regular observer in one of a number of non-partisan policy groups in D.C. right leading up to the election and through the transition and into the new Administration (this one on homeland security and terrorism) that had wonk huddles in D.C. in preparation for the new administration giving their thoughts, and hopes and desires to the new Administration. We also know that he personally hoped that with the new Administration, Iraq and Afghanistan would be wound down. But it is not corect to say that he was on any kind of official Obama transition team--to the extent I have researched it--and GWU has also clarified that. Having said that, he did have intricate access (probably out of political correctness or whatever) and wormed his way in to these things. Look how close he got to an Ambassador of (to him) an enemy country like Israel.
Good one.
George Washington University’s think-tank that put these events on issued a terse, one paragraph (probably lawyer-drafted, probably panicked-state) PR statement yesterday in D.C. that yes, they did let “AbduWali” (Hasan) in the wire, but that these were “public events” anywho. They dropped it right then and there. They probably do not want ANYONE digging around and asking that kind of question that you and Bahbah are rightly asking. WHO LET HIM IN? WHO INVITED HIM? WHY?
Hasan's "counseling" activities provided him access to all kinds of sensitive information about troop morale, operations, vulnerabilities, etc. He was certainly in a position to collect this type of intelligence.
Great work.
I’ll be using this before the clips disappear.
http://keepvid.com/
Stunning. AIT, good work, but I truly am speechless. Too many people, from the Army to the planners of events like these, blithely allow, perhaps even invite, the sworn enemies of freedom into our midst. How can we win the war on terror if we keep playing pattycakes with the terrorists??
Can’t see the clips. CommieTube is down.
The Code of Conduct
Posted Friday, October 7, 2005
I
I am an American, fighting in the forces which guard my country and our way of life. I am prepared to give my life in their defense.
II
I will never surrender of my own free will. If in command, I will never surrender the members of my command while they still have the means to resist.
III
If I am captured I will continue to resist by all means available. I will make every effort to escape and to aid others to escape. I will accept neither parole nor special favors from the enemy.
IV
If I become a prisoner of war, I will keep faith with my fellow prisoners. I will give no information or take part in any action which might be harmful to my comrades. If I am senior, I will take command. If not, I will obey the lawful orders of those appointed over me and will back them up in every way.
V
When questioned, should I become a prisoner of war, I am required to give name, rank, service number, and date of birth. I will evade answering further questions to the utmost of my ability. I will make no oral or written statements disloyal to my country and its allies or harmful to their cause.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.