I’m one who believes Obama’s BC is irrelevant to the issue, give that Obama admits that both he and his father were governed by British law.
In the court of public opinion it means everything.
Not being a lawyer, I’m not sure if the possibility of blackmail is enough to compel a person to release private, personal information.
The argument has the potential to sway those who require justification to fully support us “birthers”.
Potential vulnerability to blackmail is one of the principal variables investigated when vetting anyone for a security clearance. Application for a clearance requires divulging of all sorts of intimate personal information.
No one with the vulnerabilities that Øbama has would have any chance of receiving even a low-level clearance.
Yet, he sits at the very apex of top secret national security information with zero clearance at all!!!.
How is this possible?
America needs a law or a Constitutional amendment) requiring that no one can be a candidate (on the ballot) for the Presidency or Congress without first having passed the background investigation for (at least) Final Top Secret clearance.
(FWIW, that would also identify and eliminate non-qualified non-natural-born candidates for President.)