The latter to me is more believable. But that might border on politically incorrect. Can't have THAT now, can we??
He sure fits a profile of a 9-11 type hijacker though, doesnt he?
This is the worst case of radical islamic terrorism on US soil since 9-11.
Yes it is!
We were not attacked here in the States under President Bush.
This was a Muslim terrorist attack - no matter what else is said - and it is just the FIRST attack during Zero’s reign.
There will likely be more as he continues his “surrender monkey” impersonation as CIC.
Yup. His handing out copies of the Koran and affecting traditional Islamic garb shortly before his bloody rampage are easily swept under the rug - or so the state-run media seems to be betting.
He couldn’t face the fact that he was alone, it doesn’t matter if he has a stupid belief in anything, he could believe in nothing and still go insane, I’m sure they will nitpick his brain over, but I think it maybe a waste of time, not only are Muslims insane like any religious “belief system” they are particularly dangerous in a Jim Jones kind of cult way. Maybe if got rid of his rigid moralistic paternalistic thinking most of those people would be alive today, he obviously sought a father figure in the military and country and his religion, he wanted somebody to “hold his hand”, in other words a basket case, cause no one was there to really slap him in the face for being such a fool...just a bunch of existential angst...too much to get any fun out of the absurdity of life, so much so he couldn’t laugh at himself from the sound of it, sounds too much like many people that themselves too seriously, what a “cosmic schmuck”!
The two are not mutually exclusive. In fact, the first probably helps to explain the second.
I don't know why FReepers always get so pissed off by this sort of article. It's good background information on the bad guy.
It's the curse of the internet, I guess ... it's always easier to scream and shout when you don't have real information to stumble over.