Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GodGunsGuts
What a dope.

You're the one who blantantly admited you don't know even the basic tenant of the scientific method: Post #16 So you are saying that the scientific method is not based on beliefs or assumptions?

You're like someone denigrating Christianity without even reading John 3:16 (you have read that verse?).

Given your stunning admission of blind loyalty to ignorance your posting history can now be clearly seen in the light of a Godless Leftist plant.

135 posted on 11/06/2009 8:36:25 AM PST by Balding_Eagle (Overproduction;, one of the five top worries of the American farmer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: Balding_Eagle

Did you read the link, Baldy? Science is indeed based on a number of assumptions that cannot themselves be absolutely proven—that is why they call them ASSUMPTIONS (and the link I sent you is only a partial list!). And btw, the biblical creation account is affirmed in the Old Testament and the New Testament...even by Jesus Christ Himself...and by science. The fact that a straightforward and honest reading of the Bible (which also happens to be the historic position of the Church) makes you so upset speaks volumes about your so-called Christianity. You came to the wrong forum if you want to stiffle Creation and/or ID. But don’t worry, your leftist, anti-science, evo-religious mantra is much better received by your pals over at the DU...as I’m sure you are well aware of from long experience.


138 posted on 11/06/2009 9:03:30 AM PST by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson