Honestly, I do not NEED to know what Darwin wrote. Darwin is but a small protion of the entire issue.
Did life start spontaneously, a mixture of dead organics that miraculously combined in a very specific way that enabled it to ‘live’.
Following that, did that new life, over millenia change from single cell status to the life we see today.
I say NO to this. I say the life forms wew see today (as well as those that are since extinct) were called into being in an act of creation.
Having said that, again, in regards to the larger issue, adaptation is NOT evolution. Mankind did not ‘evolve’ from some small primitive animal that ‘might have’ lived millions of years ago.
To echo your question, You really have no idea what is in Genesis and WHY it is so important to liberals and such that it be ‘proven’ untrue, do you?
Quite the opposite. I’m very familiar with both works. It’s the ‘head in the sand’ attitude you’ve taken that makes this discussion so cathartic. Your don’t “need to know what Darwin wrote” statement is very telling about the level of discussion that you’re capable of. If you were going to write a book critique about Tom Sawyer would you also expect full credit for saying that since Samuel Clements used a pen name (a sure sign of a fraud) you can just guess at what’s in the book and not have to read it.
You’re suffering from willful ignorance. The only cure for which is to read what you are in opposition to so you can “intelligently design” your response.