Maureen Dowd: Who Are You Calling a Narcissist, Rush?

The New York Times ^ | November 3, 2009 | Maureen Dowd

[2ndDivisionVet]

What a waste of oxygen she is.

[noblejones]

Are all “journalists” transsexuals?

[Blogger]

[GQuagmire]

Ahem...rules dammit...

[Shadow44]

I love that rule.

[StAntKnee]

Catt-eh, eh, what.

[webschooner]

MoDo, you are an ignorant slut.

[clintonh8r]

Mo, just because Rush has a huge ego doesn’t mean he can’t point that out in someone else, just as in the same way it’s OK for you to say someone else is a depressed, dried up old skank....

[Eagles6]

I only check in on these dowd posts to see pictures of Catherine.

[DGHoodini]

You! You feath ffreak junkie. Maureen Shroud! Take the nbeedle out from between your toes.

[lookout88]

A “true” douche bag.

[Eagles6]

Err...uhh...Katherine.

[Tzimisce]

Who are we calling Narcissists?

Well not the columnists at the New York Times - parish the thought....

[onemiddleamerican]

Thank goodness for that rule.

[freedumb2003]

>>reporterette<<
He has grown — now, they are “News-babes.”

And you ain’t one no more, Mo.

[Mr_Moonlight]

Nuff Said :)

[Trod Upon]

Angry spinster with a keyboard, clinging, clinging, clinging to whatever scraps of relevancy remain.

[khnyny]

Limbaugh is right that Democrats tend to dither too much. They’re always wondering if they’re doing the right thing, indulging in on-the-one-hand, on-the-other paralysis by analysis, seeing, as James Carville put it, “six sides to the Pentagon.”

That's code for "no leadership ability" and "can't pull the trigger".

[Batman11]

That one never gets old! I’m just here for the pictures, dammit!!

[Peacekeeper357]

Much rather have Rush as the face of my party than Rahm.