[reaganaut1]

The anti-American leftist is going down!

[T. Buzzard Trueblood]

Thirty-four percent (34%) would be very likely to support Obama, while 40% say they would be not at all likely to do so.

Heh heh. I wonder if "willing to crawl over ground glass in a burning building under machine-gun fire to vote against him" one of the options?

[Tzimisce]

Who cares?

We’re three years away from the next election. So much will change.

We don’t even know who Obama’s opposition will be in 2012. It could Michael Moore on the Republican ticket the way things are going....

[stevecmd]

365 days too late

[Tax-chick]

Unfortunately, “Nobama” isn’t going to be a choice in 2012. There will be one or more named opposing candidates. That worked out so well last time ...

[Canedawg]

women are more supportive of Obama than men.

We know all about the Jews who are too blockheaded to turn away from liberalism, but the recent voting record of females in this country is nauseating.

And don't bother telling me it's not ALL females. I know that, just as it isn't all Jews who voted for Zero- just all my friends and family. So we now know that the Jewish people aren't as smart as they think they are- what are the women's excuse for siding with the marxist muslim?

:-(

[Bad Jack Bauer]

Oh yeah? Run McCain against Obama again and Obama would beat him everyday of the week and twice on Sunday. Hell, I would for Obama if the GOP was stupid enough to run a RINO like McCain again.

[WOSG]

36% support among white Americans.

Wow, that is low.

[comebacknewt]

I can’t help but being disappointed to see that roughly half the country still supports a Kenyan Socialist.

[pallis]

There is no accounting for the masochistic stupidity of some American voters, as many as 30 percent. People actually voted for Jimmy Carter his second time around, and the same kinds of people would vote for Obamao again.

[Jeff Chandler]

The Republican candidate for 2012 is encouraged.

[WashingtonSource]

Just think if the media had done its job during the elections we may have been spared this nightmare for freedom and liberty and the American way!

[Girlene]

An even more interesting poll!

[Plumres]

I would not let Obama be in charge of my pet rock!

[Buckeye McFrog]

even if the opponent was McLame?

[AuH2ORepublican]

If Obama is doing this poorly in a poll of adults, imagine how he’d do in a poll of likely voters.

Only 36% of whites adults are at least somewhat likely to vote for Obama in 2012. Holy unelectability, Batman!

[phillyfanatic]

And these are likely voters. Still, it depends on whether the large electoral states will still turn against the faux Messiah. It is necessary for Pubs to advance their conservCenterright agenda and pull in more Indies, Reagan Dems, and Libertarians to chip away at all those huge Blue State electoral majorities. Prayerfully, 2010 will start the chipping.

[RipSawyer]

“As in that contest, women are more supportive of Obama than men.”
////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

That settles the question of which sex is smarter.

[lawyerchik1]

I’m not sure if you caught this on Rush Limbaugh’s show on Thursday, January 21, 2010, but this was from the transcript of his show regarding the Chris Matthews/David Axelrod exchange:

“AXELROD: They’re standing with the insurance companies. So they can talk the talk, but when it comes time to walking the walk, they don’t do it, and we’re — I’m — happy to have that contest, uhh, next — uhh, uhh — next November if the president chooses to run in 2012, and we’ll see who the real deal is when it comes to standing up for working people.”

He said “...IF the president chooses to run in 2012....” Something’s going on with that! I’m not sure what, but that seems pretty unusual, considering that this clown has been in office for just barely a year. Anybody have any insight?