[GodGunsGuts]

That's ok, I already knew you couldn't provide a step-by-step example of macroevolution using any of your proposed mechanisms. I just wanted to make sure that you knew it too.

Good night :o)

[Ira_Louvin]

How about you show the empirical evidence in this article that supports a 6 day creation, and a 6,000 year old earth?

[Natural Law]

"That's ok, I already knew you couldn't provide a step-by-step example of macroevolution using any of your proposed mechanisms."

This is another case of GGG moving the goal posts. Had you provided a detailed step-by-step process flow he would have rejected it because it didn't include balanced chemical equations (that he wouldn't understand). You don't answer to him anyway. There are plenty of us on these threads who are interested in what you have to say. We might even disagree from time to time without being too disagreeable.

[NicknamedBob]

"I already knew you couldn't provide a step-by-step example of macroevolution using any of your proposed mechanisms. I just wanted to make sure that you knew it too."

I was led to this page by using Google, and your phrase, "step-by-step example of macroevolution", so it should by rights have information that we both would find interesting or fascinating by various degrees.

Note that the researchers consider the facts and evidence thoroughly, dispassionately, and without regard to the direction in which those facts seem to lead. What more could one ask in a search for truth?

Here is a passage of relevance to our discussion. I have bolded the portion which relates to my above description of chromosomes becoming longer. :

"... the common descent hypothesis would have been falsified if the universal phylogenetic trees determined from the independent molecular and morphological evidence did not match with statistical significance. Furthermore, we are now in a position to begin construction of phylogenetic trees based on other independent lines of data, such as chromosomal organization. In a very general sense, chromosome number and length and the chromosomal position of genes are all causally independent of both morphology and of sequence identity. Phylogenies constructed from these data should recapitulate the standard phylogenetic tree as well ..."

Curiously, you may have had great confidence in the likelihood of my failing to find bolstering information for my hypothesis, but I found it surprisingly easy to do.

Perhaps you would be better advised to seek such information yourself before posting comments from individuals obviously no better qualified to comment on these matters than am I, and ones much more likely to be mistaken for having a biased viewpoint to begin with.