Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Captain Peter Blood
Who cares at this point and we already know it was Armitage.

I care. Armitage's name was conspicuously absent from almost all the MSM coverage I saw about the Plame affair, even after he was identified as the leaker. The linked article is just more of the same: innuendo-laden disinformation.

As to who knows and who doesn't know, that would make an interesting poll question. I bet that of people who had heard of Valerie Plame, less that 5% could identify Armitage as the guy who leaked her name. Most would say that Libby was responsible, then Cheney, then Rove. It was an effective propaganda campaign.

16 posted on 10/30/2009 10:19:44 PM PDT by TChad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: All

Every time Cheney speaks up, the administration instructs their minions in the media to come up with a “story”.. First it was the threat to “investigate” then it was the threat to prosecute the CIA agents and now it’s this.

They need to get a new playbook, this one doesn’t work on a real man.


17 posted on 10/31/2009 4:47:01 AM PDT by newnhdad (The longest of journeys begins with one step.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: TChad
Well you are right, the left just won't let this go.
The whole affair stunk to high heaven and Fitzgerald's investigation was a sham, an he being a Republican, what a laugh.
They knew early on it was Armitage and he admitted it was him yet they focus on Cheny and Libby, with Libby going down for not that but allegedly lying to a federal agent.
Now what I really find fault with is Bush not giving Libby a pardon as he knew Libby was innocent.
18 posted on 10/31/2009 8:00:12 AM PDT by Captain Peter Blood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson