Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: poodle

If keeping the “genetic diversity” (non human introduced, that is) means to starve the Africans, why let’s starve the Africans!


13 posted on 10/30/2009 6:05:39 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (I am in America but not of America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: HiTech RedNeck
How dare you introduce logic into the wacko environmentalist religion. This is a spiritual experience for these people; it's about what feels good, not what is scientifically correct.

(...somehow they forgot that the old hybrid grain seeds are also genetically modified, just in a more traditional low-tech way.)

14 posted on 10/30/2009 6:09:54 PM PDT by your local physicist (If the Canadians and Brazilians can drill for oil off their Atlantic coast, why can't we?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: HiTech RedNeck

For some in the Green Left, starving the Africans is the bottom line. They consider “overpopulation” the greatest threat facing the world, so if something “culls the surplus population,” it’s good in their eyes. Gates has funded population groups — but he is a heretic from the Green religion on this.


16 posted on 10/30/2009 6:39:03 PM PDT by FrontPageMag.com
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson