Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Uncle Sham
There is nothing to prevent a state from passing a law requiring that the President must file his PROOF of meeting eligibility requirements with the state and that such a filing is open to public challenge in court.

Ex Post Facto law. It would be declared Unconstitutional if attempted to be enforced against the present Kenyan Usurper.

Would be less trouble for a state governor to issue an executive order confiscating all federal revenue collected in the state until such a time as the eligibility of the present occupant of the oval office is established through proper documentation.

75 posted on 11/07/2009 6:16:00 AM PST by Calvinist_Dark_Lord ((I have come here to kick @$$ and chew bubblegum...and I'm all outta bubblegum! ~Roddy Piper))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Calvinist_Dark_Lord; Uncle Sham

“Ex Post Facto law. It would be declared Unconstitutional if attempted to be enforced against the present Kenyan Usurper.”

“Would be less trouble for a state governor to issue an executive order confiscating all federal revenue collected in the state until such a time as the eligibility of the present occupant of the oval office is established through proper documentation.”


The states should pass it this way:

No candidate’s name may be placed on any ballot in the state until the candidate has proven all eligibility for the office sought.

This would not be an Ex Post Facto law.

In the short term, the governors should indeed decree that instead of sending tax payments to the IRS, they be sent to the state department of revenue.


76 posted on 11/07/2009 6:29:36 AM PST by John Leland 1789
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson