Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: doc1019

Watch him try to do both. I can see him coming out and saying after much deliberation, blah blah blah...he’s decided Gen. McChrystal is right, and he’s sending more troops in. But - after all his blah blah blah - he’s determined that 40,000 isn’t the right number, we can achieve desired results with (pick a number)...say, 4,000 troops.

They don’t call him Liar in Chief for nothing.


15 posted on 10/29/2009 9:44:32 PM PDT by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: bigbob

Balless in Chief in charge would be more descriptive.


16 posted on 10/29/2009 9:48:58 PM PDT by doc1019
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson