Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mystery-ak; kristinn; exit82
From the article: The ban on media coverage of bodies returning to Dover was criticized for shielding the public from the human cost of war.

From mystery-ak: Complete BS!...it was done to shield and protect the families of the fallen who didn't want cameras there!

It was actually more than that, mystery-ak. It was done to protect the families from the rudeness and crudeness of the media.

I know I come across as a broken record over this subject, but I can't help it. I witnessed, as a member of the media, the utter disrespect shown by the media to not only the military, but the families of the fallen. That witnessing did not occur during "Bush's war" but when the Marines were brought home following the Beirut bombing. I was never so embarrassed to be a member of the media and I also lived in Dover at the time.

99 posted on 10/29/2009 1:56:19 PM PDT by Gabz (Democrats for Voldemort.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]


To: Gabz
Thanks Gabz....your heart is in the right place, we sometimes judge all by the actions of a few...

With family in the military, that could be me at Dover and I have no words to describe my contempt for this man!

103 posted on 10/29/2009 2:07:21 PM PDT by mystery-ak (gopbriefingroom.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson