To: The Sons of Liberty
In his ruling he quite clearly states that the Plaintiff was asking the court to set the Constitution aside and do something the court had no Constitutional authority to do.
94 posted on
10/29/2009 11:03:35 AM PDT by
El Sordo
To: El Sordo
In his ruling he quite clearly states that the Plaintiff was asking the court to set the Constitution aside and do something the court had no Constitutional authority to do.
A lamentable excuse. If the executive and legislative branches are both either violating or facilitating violation of the Constitution, that means the judicial branch is the only remaining defender of the people's constitutional liberties. And now this federal judge punts.
99 posted on
10/29/2009 11:06:40 AM PDT by
Genoa
(Luke 12:2)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson