Judge Carter Ruling on MTD

scribd ^ | 10/29/09 | Judge Carter

[Elderberry]

Latest find on Scribd. I can't get there from work.

What does it say? Is is good?

[Grunthor]

Oh the suspence! You could cut it with a baseball bat!

[rhombus]

Motion to dismiss is granted.

[Enterprise]

Not good. Defendant’s motion to dismiss is granted.

[Sir Gawain]

Thug nation.

[Carl LaFong]

If it’s Judge Crater this could really be a big story.

[Grunthor]

LOL! Did Carter say mean things about Orly as well?

[stockpirate]

PING

[rhombus]

Who knows... I didn’t read it, just slid down to the bottom to read the conclusion because no one yet said what it was on the thread.

[Irisshlass]

It says...Therefore for the reason stated above, Defendant’s
Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED, IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED October 29, 2009

[Genoa]

Now the appeal.

[reagandemocrat]

Take a writ.

[LibertyRocks]

What do you find so funny about this? I think it’s a damn shame personally.

[Ping to Lucy and NaV]

[The Sons of Liberty]

I’m no lawyer, but it looks like the Judge has been had. He granted the motion to dismiss the suit against zer0. He stated that over 69 million people wanted the usurper and he wouldn’t overthrow him. In saying so, he is also saying that The Constitution is no longer in effect.

[Just mythoughts]

NO surprise.

[LaybackLenny]

Second verse, same as the first.

[MilspecRob]

Plaintiffs have encouraged the Court to ignore these mandates of the Constitution; to
disregard the limits on its power put in place by the Constitution; and to effectively overthrow a
sitting president who was popularly elected by “We the People”–over sixty-nine million of the
people. Plaintiffs have attacked the judiciary, including every prior court that has dismissed
their claim, as unpatriotic and even treasonous for refusing to grant their requests and for
adhering to the terms of the Constitution which set forth its jurisdiction. Respecting the
constitutional role and jurisdiction of this Court is not unpatriotic. Quite the contrary, this Court
considers commitment to that constitutional role to be the ultimate reflection of patriotism.
Therefore, for the reasons stated above, Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED.

[Genoa]

If he stated that the voters trump the Constitution (in effect), then he’s not the upright jurist everyone was saying. Mob rule.

[LaybackLenny]

Noooo! This can’t be. I was told this judge was untouchable./s

[Grunthor]

“What do you find so funny about this?”

That anyone expected a judge to rule with Orly Taitz on anything. That is quite funny.

“I think it’s a damn shame personally.”

As do I since I believe that it is very possible that Oba-Mao was not born in the U.S.....the damned shame is that Orly Taitz was the point person on this case. Can no competent lawyer be found?