Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: wastedyears

I’d say a city is well within its legal rights to remove non-city property from city-owned/controlled property.

Same thing for all the memorials to people that were killed on city streets. Noboby has a right to use public property to display personal, political or religious messages.


4 posted on 10/29/2009 10:10:40 AM PDT by SJSAMPLE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: SJSAMPLE

Let me ask......Who owns the “Public Land”? Does not the public own it? Is this man not part of the “Public”? The land does not belong to the city. It belongs to the citizens of the city.


12 posted on 10/29/2009 10:17:33 AM PDT by RC2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: SJSAMPLE
Noboby has a right to use public property to display personal, political or religious messages.

And, anti-religious bigots have no right to demand the city remove it, either, if the city wants to continue to display it.

What's next? Are the same bullies going to demand the Liberty Bell be removed from public property because it has a Bible verse on it?

21 posted on 10/29/2009 10:40:13 AM PDT by Ol' Sparky (Liberal Republicans are the greater of two evils)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson