To: ravingnutter
law says postal property since a building in a strip mall is likely leased, rather than owned, would that be considered "property"? i also would wonder if the parking lot at my local post office would be covered under this law as its a city parking lot, and not owned by the post office.
24 posted on
10/29/2009 8:20:40 AM PDT by
absolootezer0
(2x divorced, tattooed, pierced, harley hatin, meghan mccain luvin', smoker and pit bull owner..what?)
To: absolootezer0
law says postal property since a building in a strip mall is likely leased, rather than owned, would that be considered "property"? About 5 years ago AOL fired 3 employees who had firearms on a leased parking lot in Utah.
AOL won in court, I think that case did wind up in a federal court.
See Reply #27 above where the out come was the opposite
35 posted on
10/29/2009 8:35:11 AM PDT by
TYVets
(Let's Roll!!! The leadership of the GOP has no spine and no guts, but we conservatives do)
To: absolootezer0
law says postal property since a building in a strip mall is likely leased, rather than owned, would that be considered "property"? Some would go so far as to say the whole facility would be considered under the ban.
My take is that they have no say on the parking lot in that case, but would have say once you enter through the doors of the post office itself, not any outer, or neighboring store.
42 posted on
10/29/2009 8:46:38 AM PDT by
IYAS9YAS
(The townhalls were going great until the oPods showed up.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson