Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Faith
I, Susan, am the constitutional authority and the legal, acting President. See Marbury V Madison, Monell V DSS, Lassiter, Bush V Gore , In Re Susan Herbert and In Re Thomas Jefferson. See also the entire Declaration and Constitution both of which are commissions that have been delivered to Susan Herbert and to all women. She owns the knowledge within them as delivery of the paper is not necessary but it has occurred as they are hanging on the wall of a museum our tax dollars support and as she owns a bound copy of both with an introduction by Warren Burger who, as a former Chief Justice, is not a person to go around signing sloppy, mistake riddled copies of our law. I, Susan, know as fact without question that my one vote is an Executive Order and may be wielded as such in an emergency or if the need arises in any way. The need arose.

This is going downhill fast-- she has gone from "incomprehensible" through "legally frivolous" and all the way to "delusional."

73 posted on 10/28/2009 12:40:48 PM PDT by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]


To: Lurking Libertarian
There was some babbling in there about some substitution of the constitution occurring in 1871. There seemed to be some other stuff that has been unsuccessfully used by tax protestors. I couldn't really get through all the Great Walls of Text.
89 posted on 10/28/2009 4:38:45 PM PDT by altair (All I want for Christmas is NO legislation passed for the rest of the year)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies ]

To: Lurking Libertarian

I already defeated the words FRIVOLOUS and DELUSIONAL:

Judges use those words to assault and batter your person.I shut them down: FRIVOLOUS means MANIFESTLY FUTILE; DELUSIONAL means NO BASIS IN FACT OR LAW.

There’s basis in fact and law for US law, SCOTUS and american history but:

A Philly court judge became so pissed off as did my own lawyer as men kept saying these words over and over that he ordered all of us to under go a forensic psychiatric evalution in order to then order these people to cease and desist. All of us had to go; the other side was able to hand pick the doc and I had to pay a large chunk of his fee. I’m thinking this is a waste of my money. Guess what? He found me perfectly sane and free of any mental defect but he found one of the men UNREASONABLE WHERE SUSAN IS CONCERNED; HE IS TO BE REMOVED FROM THIS CASE.

LOLOLOL!

I have a court order which prevents any judge and you from using those words or implying I am crazy as that report was then made an order of the Philadelphia Court and “crazy making” itself is a named form of abuse and mental illness found in the DSM as it is a form of domestic violence perpetrated by abusive men and which is prohibited EXACTLY by Art. 4 Sec.4 . Its akin to using propaganda to harm a person. It’s a form of brain washing. Only I was found to be free of any metntal defect, lol. You weren’t and may not be as your post suggests and one of them was removed as he’s so nuts but I’m good. I was ORDERED sane, lol.

Do yourself a favor: READ THE ENTIRE BRIEF as the point is PAPER IS NEVER PROOF IN ANY ACTUAL CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC AS LIFE IS PROOF.


119 posted on 10/29/2009 6:13:49 AM PDT by susanconstant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson