Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: susanconstant

The meaning can be found here

101 posted on 10/28/2009 8:05:16 PM PDT by woofie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: woofie

This is funny; I might copy this and send it to Roberts and the other Justices and clerks for a laugh. It’s not me it’s them trying to wrap their brains around what their own court is or is not as they openly advertise they are violating your rights on their own website, lol.

SCOTUS says as law you may not enter SCOTUS as a right. I said, “In actual reality you may enter as a right and under more than one set of circumstances plus you may not except your court from Amendment 1 and this court does not make law; SCOTUS rule is never US law. YOU, a Justice, are not the exception to US law; you’re not above it or me. Besides, to whom or to what court do I go to when a clerk or Justice directly and personally injures me and so I need redress in order to secure justice? I go to a Justice, the Justice that injured me or his clerk who injured me; I go...SCOTUS. As a right.”


111 posted on 10/29/2009 6:13:48 AM PDT by susanconstant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson