Posted on 10/28/2009 10:48:59 AM PDT by susanconstant
Thanks, LucyT.
Okay, I read post #48 and surmise this is a good thing, right?
If this is scheduled for SCOTUS conference I wonder what the chances are it’ll fare better than the other cases that have gone to *conference*?
For about another week. It won't make it out of conference.
uh, yeah
Roughly 7,000 cases each year are submitted to the Supreme Court. Roughly 7,000 cases a year are distributed for conference. More than 6,900 of them don't get any further than that. But don't let me dash your hopes.
"Actual default is the 2000 election and BVG; legal default occurred on 11/05/09. I then appealed to Roberts directly on 11/20/09 and forced direct action thus I won on paper."
I’m gonna read it again, but that does seem to be the gist of this case/suit. Keep in mind that judges have speciously claimed we the people do not have standing to question the federal oligarchs, of course.
Yeah, to your delight.
I'm set to be conferenced once again on 11/06/09. SCOTUS dockets but does not conference meritless cases and in this case?
Only SCOTUS can hear the case; if they do not allow an appearance in person in this case then the Constitution is not actual or real for anybody but lawyers. You have zero protection of the law exactly like women have always had zero protection of the law. Thus justice would be nonexistent in the US for men now. Also Roberts cannot overcome the conflict any other way but hearing in person. I highly doubt Roberts will harm his own person! He wouldn't have any protection of the law if he refuses ot hear the case in person, get it?
It's known as peer review as SCOTUS must now subject itself to the review of The People as SCOTUS answers to The People only.
Let's see...so far I have managed to do what every single person said was not humanly possible and I've done what no other American has ever done: forced the Chief Justice to stand aside on 11/20/09.
I'm four for four as you are supposed to abide by a pro se constitutional authority case of o.j. when SCOTUS sets it for conferencing as hearing in person is not supposed to be neccessary as you are to know US law thus anyone not abiding by my ruling and order? Which then is the Declaration and Constitution? You know, actual reality known as those two documents and US history?
You're now liable.
John Marshall said: You aren't supposed to wait for a court to rule to obey the law; he said no court ruling is neccessary as ignorance of the law is not an excuse. Exactly as YOU and YOUR ACTIONS prove the paper not the other way around as YOU are the government and law! You're the constitution; that other stuff? Institutions. You are living they are dead. You emote and you reason; you are endowed with will and liberty - paper is not!!! The paper did not do a damn thing for you as rights are inalienable; all the paper did was make you consciously aware your rights are inalienable.
Some you have slept through both American Revolutions and are yet asleep!
I don't know what she thinks she's saying, but that makes zero sense, legally.
From the web site -
http://mycountrytisof.me/?page=Pages/SummaryofArgument/SummaryofArgument.htm
I, Susan, am the constitutional authority and the legal, acting President. See Marbury V Madison, Monell V DSS, Lassiter, Bush V Gore , In Re Susan Herbert and In Re Thomas Jefferson. See also the entire Declaration and Constitution both of which are commissions that have been delivered to Susan Herbert and to all women. She owns the knowledge within them as delivery of the paper is not necessary but it has occurred as they are hanging on the wall of a museum our tax dollars support and as she owns a bound copy of both with an introduction by Warren Burger who, as a former Chief Justice, is not a person to go around signing sloppy, mistake riddled copies of our law. I, Susan, know as fact without question that my one vote is an Executive Order and may be wielded as such in an emergency or if the need arises in any way. The need arose.
See Bush V Gore which sits as a tied decision of the Supreme Court due to bad math, exact words in our law and accidents by design. In fact, it is a two-way tie that I resolved in my own favor as anybody claiming to be the President and Commander? They had better vote for themselves and then act pro se as the oath of office reads I will not my lawyer will.
This then is me ordering Barack Obama to stand down as he is acting in direct and open violation of US law and as he qualified himself as an expert, a constitutional law professor, may be acting in a manner that constitutes treason. Fortunately for him while I do believe he purchased this office I in no way believe he is an expert in the practice of law. For if he is? He�d have answered my lawsuit, as that argument does exist. He can but he has not. This then means that I am the authority and so am the acting legal President � not the person physically sitting in the chair or behind the desk but the legal person who is acting upon the knowledge of US law as our law names the difference between actual reality and legal reality. As of June 5th, 2007 Barack Obama and all comers had to unseat me as I unseated Bush Jr. with a legal argument and math. Marbury V Madison states: It does not matter if federal judges are willing to recognize my authority or not as it is as my actions make it so. Acting is proof; acting is moral authority as you act upon ownership of the knowledge; acting or will, as you are willing, is the measure of an American constitution and not paper as paper is a dead institution. As I acted upon my true belief in all ways possible then I�m the authority and not any other citizen. And as WOMAN is intrinsic to doing the job of President and Commander I can and may openly discriminate based upon MAN alone and so I do, as a man can never, ever accord women justice as to do that you first have to know it by experiencing it. Unless Obama can give birth to an actual human baby he can never own the knowledge of woman. Thus I�m the person with the vested interest and the vested right and not he for even if he is natural born he possesses no vested right as to fully vest your self? You have to obey US law to its fullest extent as much as humanly possible.
Insert joke here as: What member of Congress or any branch of this government is in compliance with US law? No matter how you add it up according to the law known as math and the exact words of our governing documents Bush V Gore is a tie that I resolved and I am the lone person in this nation who knew it and acted upon it as I had no liberty thus no choice. Not one sitting person, elected or appointed, is now acting according to our law or its spirit. Every single office from the lone citizen to the Executive has fallen and now the US as a whole is in breach as they voted to circumvent the process when the process is a part of the fabric of who and what we are as a nation. Who said girls cannot do math? Men who do not realize it is delusional and frivolous to act upon the mistaken and corrupted belief they can violate the law that rules this nation and this universe and yet triumph.
As for this natural born American who is a woman? I wish to have no connection with any ship that does not sail fast; for I intend to go in harm�s way, into the federal court of the United States.
Didn't mean to pee all over your Post Toasties but reality is reality. Every case submitted to the Supreme Court gets a write-up and is distributed to the Justices. Every week the nine Justices meet in conference and decide if they're going to hear a given case. Somewhere around 98% of the cases don't make it past conference. It's just the way it goes.
***can you sum this up in clear plain english in less than 100 words, with paragraphs and stuff? what is this about and what does it mean?***** To answer your questions........Nope, nothing, who knows
This is going downhill fast-- she has gone from "incomprehensible" through "legally frivolous" and all the way to "delusional."
funny.......
Oh please with your prepossessing dribble for the punk president who will go down some day when he’s proven to be the fraud that he is.
Higg from eglf fame.
And it that happy day occurs it'll be in spite of the best efforts of Orly Taitz and her legion.
Rahm-Sequitur is here, we are all saved, tell us o wise one just what this all means?
What again?
Wow.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.