So, what evidence is there, from Blair’s response/statement to Wasserman, that he’s prepared to tell the truth?
“When I approached him with the invitation, he said that although he has not spoken publicly about the affair that led to his dismissal from the New York Times, this might be the right time and right occasion. My expectation is that he’ll talk not just about his own susceptibilities, but about the pressures and temptations that might induce ambitious and talented young journalists elsewhere in the business to do the wrong thing.”
Since he hasn’t talked publicly in any earlier venue, how does Wasserman know that Blair is prepared to ‘tell all’?
What if just continues to be what he always was - a pathological liar?
Maybe he and Dan Rather could tour together.