You missed my point. The “estimate” of the age of the Earth has gone from 5+ billion years to 10,000 and you want to quibble over the last 4,000? Or maybe you don’t...
I think you missed my point.
Dr. Berthault just “proved” that his formation is 10,000 years old.
That means the 6000-year-old origin of the earth is false.
Even if he were correct, he’s established that one formation that’s only 10 million years-old is now older than creationists claim the universe to be.
He hasn’t established anything about any other formation on this planet or any other.
Without demonstrating that the current estimate that scientists use for the earth’s age is wrong, he’s “proven” that creationists are wrong.
If creationists had any interest in facts, this should bother them.