So be it............
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161-163 next last
To: Sub-Driver
“So I say to many conservative friends who suddenly decided whether they’re from Minnesota, or Alaska, or Texas, they know more than the upstate New York Republicans? I don’t think so,” he added.”
Uh, aren’t you from Georgia?
23 posted on
10/27/2009 7:51:45 AM PDT by
VanDeKoik
(Iran doesnt have a 2nd admendment. Ya see how that turned out?)
To: Sub-Driver
There’s only one party in DC - and Hoffman isn’t a member of it.
24 posted on
10/27/2009 7:51:47 AM PDT by
Mr. Jeeves
("If you cannot pick it up and run with it, you don't really own it." -- Robert Heinlein)
To: Sub-Driver
"So I say to many conservative friends who suddenly decided whether they're from Minnesota, or Alaska, or Texas, they know more than the upstate New York Republicans? I don't think so," he added.
Funny, I don't see Georgia on that list.....
hh
25 posted on
10/27/2009 7:52:10 AM PDT by
hoosier hick
(Note to RINOs: We need a choice, not an echo....Barry Goldwater)
To: Sub-Driver
Call it what you will, Newt, but it’s a WAKE UP CALL!.................
26 posted on
10/27/2009 7:52:21 AM PDT by
Red Badger
(If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.)
To: Sub-Driver
“We have not yet begun to purge ...”
“Damn the torpedoes, full purge ahead ...”
“A purge by any other name would still clean the party of RINOS ...”
To: Sub-Driver
Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich (R-Ga.) late Monday had some choice words for Republicans supporting Conservative Party party candidate Doug Hoffman (N.Y.), accusing them of conducting a "purge" of the GOP. .. and the problem with this is ???
29 posted on
10/27/2009 7:52:45 AM PDT by
tx_eggman
(Obama has "Czars" because men with more integrity than he has still use the titles "Don" and "Capo")
To: Sub-Driver
Newt is a smart guy - not sure how he got so stupid on this issue.
31 posted on
10/27/2009 7:53:04 AM PDT by
PGR88
To: Sub-Driver
When the real purge comes, Newt should be first against the wall. /I keed...or do I?
32 posted on
10/27/2009 7:53:06 AM PDT by
thecabal
(Destroy Progressivism)
To: Sub-Driver
Wow, what an astute observation, Newt! Maybe you’re not as dumb as you look.
33 posted on
10/27/2009 7:53:10 AM PDT by
rintense
(You do not advance conservatism by becoming more liberal. ~ rintense, 2006)
To: Sub-Driver
Purge of all ACORN supporters.
34 posted on
10/27/2009 7:53:11 AM PDT by
Jet Jaguar
(A mob of one.)
To: Sub-Driver
Gingrich calls GOP support for Hoffman a 'purge' OK...your point is what?
36 posted on
10/27/2009 7:53:19 AM PDT by
markomalley
(Extra Ecclesiam nulla salus)
To: Sub-Driver
Get lost Newt. You screwed the pooch this time and your hysterical rantings trying to absolve yourself are embarrassing. I’ve supported and defended you for years...hoped against hope that you would enter the race last year. No more. I’m sick and tired of your stupid little gadfly games and your flirting with liberals. Just get lost!
37 posted on
10/27/2009 7:53:34 AM PDT by
pgkdan
( I miss Ronald Reagan!)
To: Sub-Driver
38 posted on
10/27/2009 7:53:59 AM PDT by
GeronL
(http://tyrannysentinel.blogspot.com .... I am a rogue nobody. One of millions.)
To: Sub-Driver
Oh yeah it’s a purge all right. I’ll bet if the GOP purges conservatives they’ll cease to exist in 5 years or less. They’ll cease to become a political force in less time than that.
To: Sub-Driver
“GOP candidate Dede Scozzafava” The GOP is support Dede.
It is the rest of the party that is not. Newt needs to buy a clue on this issue.
40 posted on
10/27/2009 7:54:21 AM PDT by
edcoil
(If I had 1 cent for every dollar the government saved, Bill Gates and I would be friends.)
To: Sub-Driver
I am surprised he didn’t characterize it as a “Putsch”. Noot left his nads hanging on the concertina wire around nancy peeloousi’s compound. Being bipartisan can do that to you.
To: Sub-Driver
Newt prefers to rule, not serve. He’s darn ticked off that the peasants are questioning those who rule.
42 posted on
10/27/2009 7:54:43 AM PDT by
brownsfan
(The average American: Uninformed, and unconcerned.)
To: Sub-Driver
"This idea that we're suddenly going to establish litmus tests and all across the country we're going to purge the party of anybody who doesn't agree with us 100 percent..."OK Newt, let's say I agree that we can't expect 100% agreement between the candidates and the voters. What's the line then; 80%, 70%, 50%? Under the Newt-plan, at what point can I look at the GOP candidate and say "Nope, they don't reflect my values?" Or is it sufficient that they have an 'R' after their name?
43 posted on
10/27/2009 7:55:00 AM PDT by
whd23
To: Sub-Driver
WTF???????? I’ve just lost whatever small measure of respect that I still held for Gingrich. HE needs to be purged.
44 posted on
10/27/2009 7:55:06 AM PDT by
SoldierDad
(Proud Dad of a U.S. Army Infantry Soldier whose wife is expecting twins SONS.)
To: Sub-Driver
I like what the NY Post wrote today:
“Dede Scozzafava, is the product of an obscenely corrupt political bargain by GOP bosses that sells out their party — and New Yorkers generally.”
You hear that Newt? They're talking about you babe!
45 posted on
10/27/2009 7:55:19 AM PDT by
stockpirate
("if my thought-dreams could be seen. They'd probably put my head in a guillotine" Dylan)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161-163 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson