Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GoldStandard
I'm as libertarian as anybody. But if a politician supports abortion, then it's a no-go for me. I don't care how fiscally conservative he is, when you don't support liberty for the unborn, then the rest of your agenda is suspect. Per this 12/11/00 interview with Playboy magazine via cannabisnews.com, Johnson is pro-abortion.
29 posted on 10/26/2009 6:45:29 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist (90% of the fedgov is unconstitutional. The other 10% besides the military doesnt know what it's doin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

Damn. That sucks. I thought he’d be a states’ rights guy on abortion.


32 posted on 10/26/2009 6:48:23 PM PDT by GoldStandard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

Also, who knew Playboy gave such great interviews?


35 posted on 10/26/2009 6:51:23 PM PDT by GoldStandard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
Johnson is pro-abortion.


42 posted on 10/26/2009 6:58:02 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (If they won't "secure the Blessings of Liberty to Posterity," they won't secure yours either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

Thanks for the info.........I will not even consider a proabortion candidate.


53 posted on 10/26/2009 7:06:03 PM PDT by tioga
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

Frankly, this line of reasoning makes him sound like a complete retard:

PLAYBOY: According to whom? Some statistics suggest that drug use is down.

JOHNSON: That’s absolute baloney. I just don’t buy it. In one survey people were asked if they did drugs. First, they were asked in the Seventies. I can imagine people responding, “Well, sure, doesn’t everybody?” Today, they would likely say “No way” before hanging up. It’s a different time. But if we have reduced drug use by half—some claim it has gone down from 26 million to 13 million users—where are the corresponding dollar savings?

Uh, Johnson... The first argument makes sense. It’s wrong. (There’s a reason the kid in the 1970s said, “doesn’t everybody?”) But at least it makes sense. Interviews alone cannot confirm the decline in the use of drugs that happened between 1982 and 1993. But, the second argument is sheer idiocy. That’s like saying fire prevention doesn’t work because we’re spending more money on smoke detectors. Sure, New York spends money hand over fist to incarcerate drug dealers. On the other hand, New York was a lot better place to live during the Giuliani years than during the Koch years. Even now, the recession has put New York in horrible fiscal straits, but if Johnson thinks life in New York was better in the 1970s, to Hell with him.


87 posted on 10/26/2009 7:33:52 PM PDT by dangus (Nah, I'm not really Jim Thompson, but I play him on FR.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

Yes, it’s a fool’s notion that abortion privileges equate to liberty. Only psychopaths and the delusionary desire to kill babies; the existence of abortion is both a cause and symptom of deprived liberty. It’s maddening to hear, “what about cases of incest?” Well, who do you think is taking the girl to the abortion clinic? Abortion is what allows the incest to continue! Same goes for abusive sexual partners.

(Rape is a very special concern, but rape kits can prevent pregnancies from occurring up to four days after the attack. By allowing women to hesitate until evidence goes cold, abortion even helps rapists.)


92 posted on 10/26/2009 7:40:24 PM PDT by dangus (Nah, I'm not really Jim Thompson, but I play him on FR.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson