Posted on 10/26/2009 12:37:12 PM PDT by nickcarraway
I figured as much.
And notice no one on the left asks where’s the thesis?
Just as they don’t ask where’s the $12.50 longform birth certificate?
But we have some person of no substance calling others “wingnuts”.
Lots of name-calling and no search for the facts is what characterizes the leftist media.
What about that thesis from Mrs 0 that was making the rounds of the web? I sure hope that was a fake because it sounded like it was written by a grade school student!
One must listen to Rush very carefully. The MSM does not! To those who do pay attention, the MSM looks very foolish and hypocritical. Rush's playing with the MSM gets him a lot of notoriety, but it seems like it take years to set the record straight about what actually happened when he does stuff like this. The issue of the phoney soldier remark was resolved rather quickly, but the McNabb thing still has some legs.
The idiotic Left is falling yet again for Rush’s giant setup. Rush knew all along the story was false, yet he went along pretending it was true. Only to “discover” later that it wasn’t but still maintaining his original point because we know Obama thinks those thoughts in his head anyway. Actual facts do not matter. What matters is what we KNOW to be true.
Illustrating absurdity by being absurd. Fantastically done, Rush ! :)
I don’t exactly see what the problem is... He REPORTED it as un-verified...and when it was found out to be a hoax he reported that immediately...
it SOUNDS so much like Obama it could be true...
Screw your ‘apology’
I have a feeling if he DOES offer an ‘apology’ it will be scathing and worse than any perceived injury they already see...
Michael Saul, New York Daily News is so gay/metrosexual
Rush played a clip of Obama saying those things about the constitution and redsitributing wealth.
He also said there was not a source for the “news” article so he couldn’t say it was real but we all know that Obama wants to do those things
The story was fake but accurate.
As has already been posted, Rush had first said he wasn't sure about it and then, on the same show announced that it wasn't true.
However, the best way to prove it's false is to produce Obama's real thesis at Columbia University.
Still waiting...
It’s the old Dan Rather “we know it’s true even though there is no proof” bit. Sucks to be on the other side of that, doesn’t it Barry?
I suggest that Michael Saul and the rest of the OLD MEDIA compare their accuracy rate to Rush Limbaugh's! They should sweep around their own door before trying to clean up around someone elses!
Perhaps the leftist-extremist should appologize to Sarah Palin first and maybe even GWB first.
The reporter just copied and pasted from Media Matters again, what crap.
Ledeen, BTW, is no “blogger” but a respected foreign policy analyst.
Rush was playing the media. The mainstream media, paragons of fact-checking, ran with false quotes which they used to libel and smear Rush; most of them never apologized, and instead said things like that the quotes are what Rush was thinking.
Rush took this satire opportunity to demonstrate their hypocrisy. Every word he said about this piece is right out of the words the mainstream media used talking about Rush and racism. But they don’t recognize that, because they are too stupid.
BTW< this also pokes fun at the MSM because they all have to admit that they never saw Obama’s thesis, and that they don’t care that they never saw it.
Let me get this straight, There saying that “The NY Daily News is playing fast and loose with the facts on this.” in their claim that Rush “is playing fast and loose with the facts” on something else because other reportors have have “played fast and loose with the facts” on other reports about him?
What is Rush accuracy rate? 98.7 last I remember.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.