To: presidio9
Pot is a violation of federal law. What gives this dork the right to usurp the law? HIS own authority? Another example of selective enforcement. Laws mean nothing these days—just ask the bondholders of GM.
We’re under tyranny.
5 posted on
10/26/2009 10:26:22 AM PDT by
WKUHilltopper
(Fix bayonets!)
To: WKUHilltopper
Pot is a violation of federal law. Whatever happened to state sovereignty? Is that just a quaint little outdated concept now?
To: WKUHilltopper
Pot is a violation of federal law. What gives this dork the right to usurp the law? HIS own authority? Another example of selective enforcement. Laws mean nothing these daysjust ask the bondholders of GM.
There are so many Federal laws now that they cannot enforce them all. It would take 100 million people to keep the rest of the 200 million in jail since undoubtedly we have all broken Federal laws one time or another.
Even though it is illegaly to even posess pot at the Federal level, they do not charge people for possession of small amounts.
To: WKUHilltopper
"Pot is a violation of federal law. What gives this dork the right to usurp the law? HIS own authority? Another example of selective enforcement. Laws mean nothing these daysjust ask the bondholders of GM. Were under tyranny. "
two words for ya: "Signing statements"
48 posted on
10/26/2009 12:14:21 PM PDT by
RC one
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson