Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: pissant
So if he was strictly a Conservative Party member instead of both a conservative and a former republican, you’d be pushing scozzafava down our throats?

I don't believe in ramming anything down anyone's throat, so I don't know what you are talking about by that. But I think this is a pretty special case. I can't tell the difference between Scozzafava from what I know of her, and Obama. She is pretty leftist even for most Democrats.

It seems to me that Hoffman is running as a Republican, and he has two Democrats that he is running against. That ought to work to his favor, because it splits the Democrats/liberals, and offers a real Republican choice in the election. (I don't really care what platform he runs on.)

What I disagree with you about is that you would rather have an anti-American in the Whitehouse than a weak Republican. That's just dumb, and that kind of thinking is holding the Republicans back from making real progress in America.

I understand that about 40% of voters identify themselves as conservative, while only 20% claim to be liberal. It ought to be simple for conservatives to win most elections, but that doesn't happen. Why? The only reason I know of is that some "conservatives" are too stubborn to realize that it is better to have someone in office you agree with 50% of the time than to have someone you agree with none of the time.

You are a joke Pissant. You claim to want to help Republicans, but in your heart of hearts you think that the name "Republican" serves as a rebuke. You need to get your story straight. As a proud Republican I tell you, we can do without your kind of "help."

106 posted on 10/27/2009 10:26:24 AM PDT by HoustonTech
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies ]


To: HoustonTech
I don't believe in ramming anything down anyone's throat, so I don't know what you are talking about by that.

I'm talking specifically about this race. You said that because Hoffman is nominally a republican - though he had to quit and join the Conservative Party - you'll support him. My question to you is if Hoffman had no republican ties, would you support him or Scozza?

But I think this is a pretty special case. I can't tell the difference between Scozzafava from what I know of her, and Obama. She is pretty leftist even for most Democrats.

It shouldn't be a special case. Every stinking republican CINO should have a challenger until they learn that coughing up the Specters and Crists and Snowes and Scozzafavas is unacceptable.

It seems to me that Hoffman is running as a Republican, and he has two Democrats that he is running against. That ought to work to his favor, because it splits the Democrats/liberals, and offers a real Republican choice in the election. (I don't really care what platform he runs on.)

No, he's not running as a Republican. He specifically stated the "Republican party left me". He's on the Conservative Party ticket.

What I disagree with you about is that you would rather have an anti-American in the Whitehouse than a weak Republican.

BS. I don't want either in the office. Not sure what you mean by weak republican, but I'll assume you mean liberal republican. I don't vote for liberals, period. You are free to lecture me on the lesser of two evils, but it doesn't fly with me. With lots of hard work, we now have a chance to beat the Republican establishment darling RINO, Charlie Loafers in Florida too.

That's just dumb, and that kind of thinking is holding the Republicans back from making real progress in America

. The Pubbies had a chance to make "real progess" in America, and instead, they acted like democrats in office. And stabbed the conservatives who put them in office in the back.

I understand that about 40% of voters identify themselves as conservative, while only 20% claim to be liberal. It ought to be simple for conservatives to win most elections, but that doesn't happen. Why? The only reason I know of is that some "conservatives" are too stubborn to realize that it is better to have someone in office you agree with 50% of the time than to have someone you agree with none of the time.

It's REAL hard for conservatives to win elections when the NRSC, the RNC, and the NRCC - along with the big GOP donors and the MSM - pick a batch of stinking liberals to support and declare as frontrunners. That is why this particular race in NY, as well as the tea parties, is the harbinger of the re-awakening of Reagan conservatism in America. Too bad the bitter clingers at the RNC are too stupid to see it.

You are a joke Pissant. You claim to want to help Republicans, but in your heart of hearts you think that the name "Republican" serves as a rebuke. You need to get your story straight. As a proud Republican I tell you, we can do without your kind of "help."

Trust me sally, the GOP powers don't get a nickle from me. But I've given to conservatives in many parts of the country. Hoffman being the latest. If I had been stupid enough to give the the RNC, they'd be spending my hard earned money right now on Sozzafava, Charlie Loafers, and Meg Whitman.

107 posted on 10/27/2009 11:08:03 AM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson