Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Various Examples of When a Long Form Birth Certificate is Required
10/26/2009 | Jay099

Posted on 10/26/2009 3:42:44 AM PDT by jay099

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-155 next last

1 posted on 10/26/2009 3:42:44 AM PDT by jay099
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jay099

Yea !

We don’t have to worry about BHO trying to play little league baseball in Las Dimas !


2 posted on 10/26/2009 3:48:26 AM PDT by crescen7 (game on)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jay099
Of course Indonesia does not require all this. Has BHO ever held a US passport?
barbra ann
3 posted on 10/26/2009 3:53:05 AM PDT by barb-tex (She is one of us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jay099

The problem is that Hawaii no longer issues long form birth certificates.

“Although original birth certificates (Certificates of Live Birth) are preferred for their greater detail, the State Department of Health (DOH) no longer issues Certificates of Live Birth. When a request is made for a copy of a birth certificate, the DOH issues a Certification of Live Birth.”

http://hawaii.gov/dhhl/applicants/appforms/applyhhl


4 posted on 10/26/2009 3:53:18 AM PDT by Natufian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Natufian
Yeah, isn't that conveinent? That changed a few months after Barry's inauguration and all the hub bub came up.
5 posted on 10/26/2009 4:24:29 AM PDT by autumnraine (You can't fix stupid, but you can vote it out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: jay099

5.) In Laredo, Texas a long for birth certificate is required for passport or immigration purposes:
Looks like Obama will never get to live in Texas.


6 posted on 10/26/2009 4:37:11 AM PDT by Vaduz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: autumnraine

I don’t think Obama has a BC...I think he was born in a mud hut in Kenya with some witch doctor shaking bones over him...


7 posted on 10/26/2009 5:20:04 AM PDT by Boonie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: jay099
RE :”So, if a short form birth certificate is not sufficient evidence of citizenship in any of these cases, then why would it be sufficient to be President of the United States?

Because he was elected by a wide margin. Because the constitution says NOTHING about the long form, contrary to the daily claims of birth-certificaters here.

8 posted on 10/26/2009 5:30:26 AM PDT by sickoflibs ( "It's not the taxes, the redistribution is the government spending you demand stupid")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jay099

“FREE THE LONG FORM!”


9 posted on 10/26/2009 5:48:40 AM PDT by Dryman ("FREE THE LONG FORM!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: autumnraine; Natufian

I’d like to ask Hawaiian officials why they changed the law just to help Obama cover his past.


10 posted on 10/26/2009 5:49:52 AM PDT by reasonisfaith (When liberal ideology is put into practice it accomplishes, universally, the opposite of its claims.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs
A) He was not elected by a wide margin.

B) The Constitution says nothing about proving natural-born status at all, so your "long form" saying here is meaningless.

C) In the absence of any constitutional specifics, a challenge to the status of an individual (for any reason) would be adjudicated via statutory law. The posts here show that for much less important and weighty purposes applicants are required to show original long form birth certificates. The real question is why this man refuses to do what any ordinary citizen does as a matter of course when asked, and provide his original long form birth certificate?-

11 posted on 10/26/2009 6:01:14 AM PDT by Doug Loss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs

Well, the Constitution says nothing about the long form, that’s true. This is a moral argument. Does anyone have a moral right to hold the highest office in the land while concealing about 20 kinds of vital records, and fighting efforts in court to reveal them? (Especially in a case where one parent was a foreign citizen and international travel prior to the birth was not unlikely.) If no court compels it, I hope that at least by 2012, several states will have passed laws requiring documentation of natural-born citizen status with a long-form birth certificate.


12 posted on 10/26/2009 6:05:11 AM PDT by Genoa (Luke 12:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: jay099

In New Mexico, a short form birth certificate is NOT acceptable for a Concealed Carry Permit. ONLY the long (real) birth certificate form will be accepted. However, in the case of having the “button” to nuclear weapons, apparently the federal government doesn’t require as much as New Mexico.


13 posted on 10/26/2009 6:23:11 AM PDT by Jackson57
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Genoa

The Constitution was written by honorable men for honorable men. It is dishonorable to conceal your past.


14 posted on 10/26/2009 6:24:31 AM PDT by GregNH ("Dc Rally from the Ground" by me http://gwgjlm.blogspot.com/2009/09/dc-rally-from-ground.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Genoa; Doug Loss
RE :”Well, the Constitution says nothing about the long form, that’s true. This is a moral argument.

There are so many I cant count the number of birth-certificaters that throw that “I am defending the constitution and don't care about anything else” crap. At least you are not trying that.

I think you got a pretty crappy moral argument. The first AA president (elected by a wide margin) and the moral argument is he shouldn't be president because he hasn't shown you his long form BC??? Not policy, not actions, not elections but his BC. Moral??

This is why no one will touch this birth-certificater stuff. This is poison

15 posted on 10/26/2009 6:48:20 AM PDT by sickoflibs ( "It's not the taxes, the redistribution is the government spending you demand stupid")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs

What do you think of someone who tries to conceal his past? Do you want to trust him?


16 posted on 10/26/2009 6:53:24 AM PDT by Genoa (Luke 12:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: reasonisfaith

Please post the answer that you get here!!!


17 posted on 10/26/2009 7:02:04 AM PDT by danamco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: GregNH

The usurper calls the framers “The So-Called Founders”!!!


18 posted on 10/26/2009 7:06:41 AM PDT by danamco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: LucyT

Ping


19 posted on 10/26/2009 7:08:17 AM PDT by danamco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Genoa
RE :”What do you think of someone who tries to conceal his past? Do you want to trust him?”

What do you mean past? You mean his birth? You really think anyone except a few ..I wont say.. are going to hold his birth against him? Especially being the first AA American??? Suppose his father's name is not on it. Worse here because you don't even have that dirt on him. You are fishing for stuff no one wants to know. This is poison.

20 posted on 10/26/2009 7:49:15 AM PDT by sickoflibs ( "It's not the taxes, the redistribution is the government spending you demand stupid")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-155 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson