Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Still Thinking

“She was on private property (not her own) when she saw the frank and beans.”

And what if she was on the public street in front of the house and happened to see a naked body go by the “private” window?

Point is he exposed himself by not couching himself behind closed windows, doors or walls. He made himself visible, and that doesn’t matter if you’re on your property or not.


114 posted on 10/28/2009 11:42:22 AM PDT by the OlLine Rebel (Common sense is an uncommon virtue./Technological progress cannot be legislated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies ]


To: the OlLine Rebel
And what if she was on the public street in front of the house and happened to see a naked body go by the “private” window?

If your aunt had balls your uncle would be really confused. If she was on the street or sidewalk when she got "the vision" or on other private property where she had a legal right to be (like say a neighbor with facing windows), she'd have a complaint. Since she wasn't, she doesn't. Do we actually know if the guy would have been visible from public property? Even if he were, it wouldn't be relevant because that wasn't where she was. Plus, the statute on indecent exposure in his state may require intent, which doesn't seem to be present here anyway.

He made himself visible, and that doesn’t matter if you’re on your property or not.

Certainly does, if you're on his property without his permission or knowledge. If it doesn't, it should, and somebody needs to get about fixing that oversight.

116 posted on 10/28/2009 12:36:28 PM PDT by Still Thinking (If ignorance is bliss, liberals must be ecstatic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson