Skip to comments.
Mystery deepens over what distracted pilots on plane that overshot by 150 miles
Telegraph ^
| 10/24/09
| Philip Sherwell
Posted on 10/25/2009 9:59:16 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-119 next last
To: americanophile
Surely, you don’t think they were having sex?!
61
posted on
10/25/2009 10:44:19 AM PDT
by
UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide
(IN A SMALL TENT WE STAND CLOSER! ****** IT'S ISLAM, STUPID! - Islam Delenda Est! - Rumble thee forth)
To: All
Since no one has a reasonable explanation and they will be testifying shortly....
I'm inclined to think the entire matter was a ruse.....and OBAMA will take over the entire airline industry and place it under a NEW CZAR under Homeland Security!!!
To: old curmudgeon
Pardon the double post.
My browser lied to me and told me it did not go the first time.
To: Paul46360
"But they do slow down to approach." As much as I'd love to insert a "wife" joke here, I won't. But, I believe that the plane remained at altitude up to the point that they had realized they overshot their destination. If they were at altitude, they probably didn't reduce their airspeed, which would indicate that they were out of radio contact for a considerable amount of distance before they even approached their destination.
That begs the question, did they not respond to radio calls from control, and did the tower even attempt to contact the aircraft. Long story short, how after 9/11 can a plane either on course, or especially off course, go 1.5 hours in complete radio silence. Why were there no fighters scrambled when a plane has gone silent for well over an hour? It sounds like their could be some other systemic problems at play here in addition to pilot incompetence or negligence.
64
posted on
10/25/2009 10:49:46 AM PDT
by
OldDeckHand
(No Socialized Medicine, No Way, No How, No Time)
To: LucyT
What was happening in the control tower?
65
posted on
10/25/2009 10:51:56 AM PDT
by
UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide
(IN A SMALL TENT WE STAND CLOSER! ****** IT'S ISLAM, STUPID! - Islam Delenda Est! - Rumble thee forth)
1 or 2 hot stewardesses involved?
66
posted on
10/25/2009 10:52:52 AM PDT
by
isom35
To: rickomatic
I smell a sex scandal. What other reason would there be for such secrecy? Perhaps a little mile high action distraction?
I was thinking the same thing. 78 minutes of radio silence? When did *that* clock start ticking? They could easily fly 150 miles in 20 minutes.
67
posted on
10/25/2009 10:53:24 AM PDT
by
Spirochete
(Texas is an anagram for Taxes)
To: UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide
Surely, you dont think they were having sex?!,
No I don't. And please don't call me Shirley.
68
posted on
10/25/2009 10:53:33 AM PDT
by
AmusedBystander
(No Jimmy, it's because he's a RED.)
To: PGR88
I think they lost contact with them way before they were near the airport.
Wouldn’t it be a hoot if it turns out they were like half way to the North Pole, realized it, and turned back and waited until they were just 150 miles off the path before they responded?
To: OldDeckHand
For all the reasons you mention....It's why I think the overshot was a "test" of some sort.
Notice that no one is calling it a diversion. If they flew over the airport, surely radar picked them up.
Something is up....It's all about "TIME" and we're time freaks in today's world.
To: TigerLikesRooster
Did they experience a time lose?
71
posted on
10/25/2009 10:58:46 AM PDT
by
Peter Horry
(Those who aren't responsible always know best.)
To: darkwing104
sleeping or boinking each other.
To: LucyT
What was happening in the control tower?
They seem to have not been handed off form one air space to another let alone get handed off to Approach control.
73
posted on
10/25/2009 11:00:13 AM PDT
by
mountainlion
(concerned conservative.)
To: TigerLikesRooster
Secrecy. Missing time. Confused and contradictory statements. Only one phenomenon fits this profile:
Well, OK, two phenomena:
74
posted on
10/25/2009 11:01:07 AM PDT
by
The Comedian
(Evil can only succeed if good men don't point at it and laugh.)
To: All
Just another thought....Suppose, suppose they were simulating an actual pilot who was an actual terrorist at the helm....weird.
To: PGR88
Out of contact for an hour, but only flew 150 mph past the airport?
It's puzzling as it stands but the tower was probably expecting the flight to land on it's schedule and started hailing them about a hundred miles out. The tower may have noticed that the flight hadn't descended below 24,000 approach. No radio contact and an aircraft flying right over top at altitude wasn't a threat (to them) but drove 'em nuts. Then calls were made to inform Homeland Security et al of the errant aircraft. So the time frame would be one hour but distances extended to maybe 250-300 miles, until the flight attendant woke 'em up.
We had a similar incident of an overflight here a year or so ago. A flight from Honolulu to Hilo over flew the a/p, out of contact for 20 minutes before turning around and landing. Those flights are only 45 minutes long and everybody on the a/c knew something was wrong....all they had to do was check their watches and look out the windows and see Mauna Kea and Mauna Loa pass by.
76
posted on
10/25/2009 11:08:36 AM PDT
by
BIGLOOK
(Government needs a Keelhauling now and then.)
To: nagdt
Were the pilot and co-pilot/navigator both males? These guys just might get promoted to a posh position at the FAA or ETSB.
77
posted on
10/25/2009 11:14:44 AM PDT
by
lefty-lie-spy
(Stay metal. For the Horde \m/("_")\m/)
To: TigerLikesRooster
From the article:
"There were 78 minutes of radio silence before air traffic controllers re-established radio contact after trying to contact the pilot and first officer by radio, mobile phone, text messages and email."
This suggests that they were expecting the crew's cell phones/smartphones to be on and functional. Interesting, as I would have thought SOP would be to have them turned off. Wouldn't the crew be violating FAA rules if their cell phones were operational?
To: onedoug
All modern (new generation) aircraft require FMC input from the pilots regarding destination, route of flight, arrival procedure, etc. Wrong inputs can be serious. Korean 007 learned the hard way many years ago.
Automation requires management and a crew acting in accordance with checklist procedures. I think this crew was lax in preflight deligence and enroute cockpit management. They put personal issues above the safety of the flight. They won’t go to jail, but they will no longer possess Airline Transport Pilot ratings or jobs at the end of this hearing.
To: BIGLOOK
"Then calls were made to inform Homeland Security et al of the errant aircraft." That's what was supposed to happen, but I haven't seen it reported anywhere that the tower actually made those calls. Perhaps they did, and it just wasn't reported.
And, I remember that HI incident. You're right, with a location like the HI islands, it would certainly raise many more suspicions with the passengers, because it would be so visually apparent. In that case it was definitely pilot fatigue, was it not?
80
posted on
10/25/2009 11:32:09 AM PDT
by
OldDeckHand
(No Socialized Medicine, No Way, No How, No Time)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-119 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson