[truthguy]

Also, Hannity, for one, is GREAT at giving speeches, but he does not always think well on his feat, when one of his lib guests brings up something that Hannity has not heard before.

Yes! You've noticed that as well. I tend to like Hannity and for the most part, I agree with him. But he is not a quick and in-depth thinker. He lacks intellectual vigor. He is attractive to many people who don't have a conservative champion. But I'd prefer a more in-depth representative of conservatism than Hannity. I'm an old school National Review type conservative. It's unthinkable that Hannity would pen an article for NR.

[Arizona Carolyn]

I agree with you on Hannity, his lack of depth really disturbs me in a time such as this.

[Kansas58]

Feat feet, aparently, I do not think well prior to my second cup of coffee!
LOL

[1951Boomer]

Whereas the Hammer—now that’s a different story. My husband and I instantly stop whatever we are doing when Charles Krauthammer is on TV. Perfect blend of gravitas and a twinkle in the eye.