We had better get off this “pro-choice” vs “non pro-choice” It is NOT “pro-choice” vs “non pro-choice”, but rather, pro-murder vs non pro-murder.
On November 12 the reconstituted jury convicted Scott Peterson of first-degree murder with special circumstances for killing Laci and second-degree murder for killing the unborn baby she carried.
What part of this living, breathing human being do you not understand?
Also, for someone with a sign up date of 1997, you should know:
As a conservative site, Free Republic is pro-God, pro-life, pro-family, pro-Constitution, pro-Bill of Rights, pro-gun, pro-limited government, pro-private property rights, pro-limited taxes, pro-capitalism, pro-national defense, pro-freedom, and-pro America. We oppose all forms of liberalism, socialism, fascism, pacifism, totalitarianism, anarchism, government enforced atheism, abortionism, feminism, homosexualism, racism, wacko environmentalism, judicial activism, etc.
I am for pro-life. However, sometimes you have to go through the back door to get in the house.
Making the choice issue the single and most important criteria in selecting your candidate will blind you since you can’t see the forest because trees are in the way.
The last two generations have an entirely different look at life and they certainly are not the ones we older people see. They are the “if it feels good...do it” crowd and with age and the experiences gained therein, will eventually come around to the same philosophy we have.
But...if we can’t overthrow the Marxists in power, we (and they) will never have that chance.
What I am saying is get in the door first and then do something about the right to life. It’s kind of like trying to fight a battle in Asia when you have no ships or planes. You simply have no way to get there.
