Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: john in springfield

I see a false premise with the OEC view.

The presumption is that OE theory also accepts evolution to some degree at least... or is categorized along with some form of mix of creation and evolution.

Geological evidence proves that the earth is billions of years old, but evolutionary theory/studies fail to prove that life on earth is also billions of years old.

Therefore I submit that a fourth category is missing...
OR, that OEC should be segregated from OE+naturalistic evolution (OENE)

Just because the earth is billions of years old does not necessarily mean that life on earth is also billions of years old as well.

There is no room for a mix of creationist theory with evolutionary theory. They are mutually exclusive.


53 posted on 10/23/2009 9:28:28 PM PDT by Safrguns
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Safrguns
“Just because the earth is billions of years old does not necessarily mean that life on earth is also billions of years old as well.

There is no room for a mix of creationist theory with evolutionary theory. They are mutually exclusive.”

I think that is pretty much the view of many others. The age of the earth and the age of life on it need not be the same or even close from what I've learned.

106 posted on 10/24/2009 11:53:35 AM PDT by count-your-change (You don't have be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson