I knew you'd finally agree with me when all was said and done.
Guess in the wake of Rush Limbaugh's interview on FoxNews Sunday, what I wrote the day before about the merits of capitalism was said just as equally well by him. Point made. Settled.
I certainly don’t feel compelled to do so, nor should you to me (or anyone to anyone on FR for that matter.
Backs away. Put up or shut up time comes again. You choke. Degree-less? One could fairly presume that you are. Had your chance. Balked. (Speaking of all this baseball imagary, how are those Phillies doing anyway?...)
Son with a disability? Readers can make up their minds. Used an example of one as a prop? Clearly. Hypocritcally? Demonstrably. Again. points made. Settled.
Even though the posts are 5-6 years old, they are pretty recent in your history due to your A) long FR banishment and B) all the porn/gay posts you’ve had pulled recently.
After I was restored I did take a vacation from the flame wars at FR, and since in the aftermath of it all Darwin Central boobs were dropping like flies over here --- some even hari-kari'd --- it was gratifying to know that they largely had only one of theirs to blame for the whole thing.
Kind of funny really. Poetic justice in retrospect. Business really started taking off right about then too, so I just had time to monitor RSS feeds. But the fact still remains: I'm here, he's not. I won. He lost. And he's likely reading this too beacuse you're also likely feeding it to him, and that makes it even more fun.
Now, it's clear from the implications you are making and the way you are expressing yourself here, that he's been feeding you a few of his lines. If it becomes more routine, I'll make someone aware that you are serving as a surrogate poster for a banned individual who made threats to this site and like last time, I'll leave it up to the site operators to deal with the situation as they see fit.
With business booming again this year mostly with multiple retained clients and the with all the Tea Party activity, FR's involvement became very interesting, and I came back to post again leading up to the 9/12 event.
I'll admit that my postings can be bold at times. To be successful in business you have to be bold. But like Rush, the point got made, the caracature sticks, and the liberal coterie just squeal.
The difference between the narratives in my pulled posting and yours is that some here actually expressed their agreement with the substance of what I had to say about you and another poster. No one as I recall endorsed your profanity laced rant. A spirit or envy often expresses itself in uncontrolled fits of rage, cynicism, and as often devolves further into states of clinical depression.
Apparently, some here might consider a fat dumpy woman in a pink sundress with her gut hanging below the park bench on which she sits, or an after-production cast party of drunken cast members from "CATs" still painted up as clowns, "pornography," but I for one won't quibble. It's their site.
I was current enough at the time to remember, but some even thought the way the rock group, "Kiss," made themselves up in the 1970's was "pornographic" too. I differ in my opinion and I am sure many others do too. Whether its "Kiss" or the pretend conservative evo-trolls, I recognize clowns when I see them. And I call them out.
Some get down on Ted Nugent's stage antics as "pornographic," and he's actually very conservative and one of Rush's friends too. It's stagecraft. But like I said, I won't quibble. It's not my site and I told them I'd respect their wishes. If anyone is at all curious on this point about "Kiss" or Nugent, I'm content to let readers look all that up for themselves.
Sorry I missed you at the 1st FreeRepublic National Tea Party Convention. Maybe if you're there at the next one we'll have to make it a point to meet, and maybe we can see how credible, educated, and un-rehearsed a conservative thinker you really are in person.
